· 20 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 7, 2026 at 3:12 AM

Venezuela tells UN court that mineral-rich part of Guyana was fraudulently taken in colonial era

Posted by Saltedline


Venezuela tells UN court that mineral-rich part of Guyana was fraudulently taken in colonial era
AP News
Venezuela tells UN court that mineral-rich part of Guyana was fraudulently taken in colonial era
Venezuela insists that a mineral-rich region of Guyana was fraudulently taken in the 19th century. Venezuela’s representative made the argument on Wednesday.

🚩 Report this post

20 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
cyberianscribe 6 days ago +36
I wonder what the natives are thinking?
36
TeachingSpiritual888 3 days ago +9
Natives consider themselves guyanese and own most of southern part of the essequibo,my family have lived in the essequibo area for generations on the Northern side and everyone I know don't want to apart of Venezuela
9
Arcadia1972 3 days ago +13
Venezuela has done so well in modernizing and creating its own stable society, it should now have Guyana. Yeah, no. Nationalistic banana republic lying fcks
13
MaybeTheDoctor 3 days ago +8
Endangered word of the day: Covetousness
8
jumbocactar 6 days ago -12
I was explaining this to people when the USA took over Venezuela. I just know that they "the USA" are going to force this land grab and then steal all that stuff from Venezuela instead of Guyana. Dirty ass 4d chess, the art of the steal.
-12
snarky_answer 5 days ago +22
The same US that’s been supporting Guyana this entire time and already has United States companies building up oil infrastructure after they sign contracts with the Guyana government? That makes no sense to support Venezuela claim to something the US already has access to.
22
BorntoBomb 6 days ago +4
Theres no art , its the bumble of the steal.
4
Conscious_Problem924 6 days ago -42
It isn’t woke to confront the absolute reprehensible shit western society has done to Africa, Asia South America. Being uncomfortable makes you grow my homies.
-42
jamie9910 6 days ago +51
It is woke if you only focus on western moral missteps without considering that atrocities have been part of the human story since we have existed as a species. It is woke if you hold western countries to different standards than non western countries. It is woke if you expect impossible to meet moral perfection from the west which prevents us from fighting wars or protecting ourselves, while our enemies work with complete operational freedom.
51
jumbocactar 5 days ago -6
If you don't try to always do the right thing you are complicit not absolved.
-6
CombatWomble2 5 days ago +9
Sure so what about China?
9
Conscious_Problem924 6 days ago -18
I’m talking about the way Western Europe colonized India and Africa and the USA overthrowing democratically elected but communist govs in Latin America. When I say woke it means acknowledging western society colonizing the world and the centuries of theft, r*** and murder. The contras, the cocaine, the CIA death squads in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Honduras, Panama.
-18
jumbocactar 5 days ago -4
I'm with you, these apologists don't even apologize anymore, shameless greed built on the backs and resources of people who were born in a place, by un natural violence.
-4
Independent_Row_224 4 days ago +5
Oh so we should be demanding the Mongolians to apologise for what they did to half the world as well then? Oh wait that doesn’t count. What about the Arab and African tribes who also participated in the Atlantic slave trade and even before that? Oh they don’t count either? How conveniently comfortable it must be to view the world through a victim vs oppressor lens without any nuance.
5
Ornery_Tension3257 2 days ago -1
'How conveniently comfortable it must be to view the world through a victim vs oppressor lens without any nuance." What nuance? Others did it so we should the same?
-1
xantub 6 days ago -29
It was.
-29
Another-attempt42 6 days ago +23
*Venezuela* was "fraudulently taken during the colonial era. Or is Spanish native to that part of the world?
23
xantub 6 days ago -17
It was an uninhabited area of Venezuela. This is referring to the 19th century, when Venezuela was a recognized independent country. UK just decided to send some dude west until he found a town and declared the whole area theirs basically.
-17
TeachingSpiritual888 3 days ago +6
Incorrect the essequibo has never been uninhabited, indegious tribes have lived there for generations even before the Spainish even claimed the essequibo,the dutch inhabited the land they just didn't have it on the map or gave it a name because they thought the land was useless, the British came after then the Spainish came sent a explorer and he drew the essequibo onto their maps and left. They never spent a day,a night or even tried to help the people that lived there,they have zero claim to anything
6
ImamBaksh 3 days ago +5
Simply as a starting point to any discussion of Essequibo's ownership, my standard challenge to anyone supporting Venezuela's claim is: 1. Identify any Venezuelan or Spanish settlement, fort or trading post ever set up in the disputed region and its years of operation. 2. Identify any indigenous population group/settlement that ever acknowledged or operated under Spanish or Venezuelan authority in the disputed region. 3. Identify any Spanish or Venezuelan administrative activity that has ever taken place in the disputed region e.g. taxation, land titling, court cases, infrastructure works etc Again, this is just as a starting point of the discussion. So we can establish the land was indeed Venezuelan at some point before we even get to the issue of whether it was taken. Point 2 is especially important I think, because while there are no Spanish/Venezuelan accounts of it happening, there ARE accounts of Indigenous groups driving them out of the disputed area.
5
← Back to Board