· 198 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 1, 2026 at 6:07 AM

Video shows moment shooter tried to storm White House dinner, officials say | White House correspondents' dinner shooting

Posted by coupon4everyone


Video shows moment shooter tried to storm White House dinner, officials say
the Guardian
Video shows moment shooter tried to storm White House dinner, officials say
Footage posted on social media by federal prosecutors includes captions claiming Cole Tomas Allen shot first

🚩 Report this post

198 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Skittlepyscho May 1, 2026 +1335
*The video was posted shortly after US Secret Service director Sean Curran told Pirro’s former employer Fox News that Allen was stopped not by Secret Service gunfire, but by a box used to transport a metal detector, which he tripped over as he ran through a checkpoint outside the venue.*
1335
Area51_Spurs May 1, 2026 +533
Reminds me of when Homer went to space and they were saved by the rod.
533
JustGottaKeepTrying May 1, 2026 +134
In box we trust!
134
UnstableMabel May 1, 2026 +39
My boy is a box! Damn you, a box!
39
seeker4482 May 1, 2026 +13
Well, we don't assemble the boxes here, that's done in Flint, Michigan.
13
UnfunPete May 1, 2026 +63
Not just any rod, it’s an inanimate carbon rod!
63
FlounderSubstantial7 May 1, 2026 +24
Aw, they were showing a close-up of the rod.
24
A_Wild_Nudibranch May 1, 2026 +8
I don't want any damn vegetables...
8
rotr0102 May 1, 2026 +9
I’ll show you INANIMATE !
9
AManNamedJane May 1, 2026 +8
I rod we trust
8
gabacus_39 May 1, 2026 +16
Inanimate cardboard box
16
DummyDumDragon May 1, 2026 +285
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I'm laughing at the idea that it was all staged, and he wasn't meant to trip but when he did all the other police/actors are like "ah shit, I suppose we have to arrest him now... Nice one, Johnny, you fucked the whole thing"
285
DrSpaceman575 May 1, 2026 +126
What’s hilarious is that from the shooters social media, he believed the Virginia attempt was staged. So he’s willing to do it, but not willing to believe it might happen.
126
Tesseract14 May 1, 2026 +33
Just because he believed a specific event was inauthentic does not mean he believes all related events are always inauthentic, nor impossible.
33
ViciousSquirrelz May 1, 2026 +138
It was staged in that, they knew he was coming. So they had the president go to something he hasn't been to before and waited for him to arrive. That's why they were so quick with saying assassination attempt with shots fired. That's why all his personal information was out within an hour of our happening. It was never about what actually happened, but the narrative they could spin to get something out of it. For instance in a day, congress found the money to create trumps new bunker.
138
weluckyfew May 1, 2026 +87
I love how conspiracy theorists are always so sure about themselves and their little theories. There's never any "well it could be this" or "it's in the realm of possibility" - it's always "this is 100% definitely what happened and if you believe otherwise you're a sheep and a fool." You keep saying the FBI knew about this ahead of time because they had the manifesto, and yet everything I'm reading says the shooter's brother only got the manifesto 10 minutes before the shooting and that's when he informed authorities. If you have a source that says otherwise please link it instead of just saying "if you don't believe me you're just not paying attention and you don't know what you're talking about"
87
LumberBitch May 1, 2026 +3
I could believe the FBI letting it happen as a false flag but I can also believe that a quagmire of incompetence let it get this far. Both are plausible with this admin and we may never know which it was. Plus, the GOP never lets a tragedy go to waste so them milking it for some gain is a given regardless. Personally I can accept that there's limitations to what I'll ever know for certain, but I do find it amusing that so many people on both sides don't believe this is real. It undermines their credibility regardless
3
EnvironmentClear4511 May 1, 2026 +55
First off, who's "they"? Second, Congress didn't find the money. No additional spending has been passed. 
55
MrWeirdoFace May 1, 2026 +21
> First off, who's "they"? I'm going to go with Five Guys Burgers and Fries.
21
rje946 May 1, 2026 +4
I knew they were shady!
4
[deleted] May 1, 2026 -5
[removed]
-5
qtx May 1, 2026 +28
Just saying things doesn't make it true, that's just conspiracy nutters talk. Give us the source.
28
PM-Me-Your-Macchiato May 1, 2026 +7
This is an interesting theory that I haven't seen yet. Are there reports or anything that point to them knowing any of this?
7
Peripatetictyl May 1, 2026 +63
Get that box a promotion to crate!
63
Bornlastnight May 2, 2026 +2
I didn’t seem him trip over anything the box never moves.
2
pauloss_palos May 1, 2026 +1349
So he didn’t actually take any shots?
1349
Civil_Future_2095 May 1, 2026 +1158
Nope. It was friendly fire.
1158
DGCA3 May 1, 2026 +763
And the cop in the foreground doing the first shooting is firing right in the direction of other people.
763
Putrid-Bee-7352 May 1, 2026 +276
Honestly they’d have stopped him faster if that cop had stuck a foot out to trip him instead of taking the time to pull a gun.
276
DearCory May 1, 2026 +74
I totally get hindsight is 20/20, and this angle could make them look a lot closer, and none of this is actually real... but I feel like that one dude could've just said "BOO!" and he would've fallen down he was that close. Why not go for the physical take down in some way???
74
Magjee May 1, 2026 +32
Someone with a dog follows him to the room and then fucks off 2 seconds before he came charging out Two people removing the metal detector, okay they are working The rest are chit chatting or just waiting around to go home   If this was a trained operative or a team it feels like they would have breached the hall
32
SmugFrog May 1, 2026 +67
They were being complacent. If ANYONE had been focusing on the point of entry this would’ve been over much faster. And the guy on the right looks like he fires a shot before he even has his gun fully pulled. Amazing.
67
ObjectiveDark40 May 1, 2026 +48
Dude a cop walks through the door like 10 seconds before the shooter emerges. There a K9 sniffing at the door and his handler is just watching this guy running out. 
48
muftak3 May 1, 2026 +22
I called out how the guy walked from his room to the stairs leading to the Ballroom and not one person or K-9 noticed. A persons response was, there is no proof he walked through the hotel. He teleported aparently.
22
akira410 May 1, 2026 +13
> He teleported aparently. Someone get that man in FEMA.
13
DummyDumDragon May 1, 2026 +27
Trained to shoot first, ask questions later?
27
CapnSmite May 1, 2026 +19
Bold of you to assume they're trained to ask questions at all.
19
TurtleRockDuane May 1, 2026 +2
You’re absolutely right about the officer in the foreground at the bottom with the word “police” on his back it just simply stepped forward and tackled him like a football tackle. Or at least attempted a trip like you said.
2
TheHamburglar_ May 1, 2026 +81
You can literally see the one cop buckle as he gets hit by shot 2. What’s crazy is shot one miraculously misses the head of the cop on the floor with the metal detector and shots 3 and 4 miraculously missed the other security personnel. I understand people do dumb things under pressure but a potential quadruple murder is a pretty big whoopsie.
81
RogerianBrowsing May 2, 2026 +4
Is it really miraculous? We don’t see any actual evidence of any gun shots. They don’t just make clean holes in walls or whatever, dust and fragmentation/spall occurs. We see none of that. The only indication anything happened was a cop seemingly injuring his lower half, which it should be mentioned goes contrary to the public statements. Combined with nonsense like the K9 officer literally looking at and talking with the supposed attacker just seconds before and it couldn’t be more obvious how staged it is. Throw in the “manifesto” which says nice things about Kash Patel, the insisting that the government crack down on people’s rights in hotels and public transit, or the fact that the government purposefully put out low res video then AI slop before the final released version, and it’s more than clear.
4
jigokubi May 1, 2026 +13
His reaction time in drawing his gun was nice, but his lack of consideration of other officers in his line of fire was wild.
13
playfulmessenger May 1, 2026 +7
And the slow-play section appears to reveal the background middle cop was the one taking the friendly fire.
7
[deleted] May 1, 2026 +7
[removed]
7
platasnatch May 1, 2026 +3
Mixed messages, he was checking out dudes junk when he started blastin'
3
Gatonom May 1, 2026 +2
Dammit Butters!
2
Daren_I May 1, 2026 +6
His first two shots appeared to have a relatively clear background to where he was aiming but the third shot had someone a couple of feet immediately behind the target.
6
Capitain_Collateral May 1, 2026 +27
It’s not great, no… but to be honest an armed unknown threat trying to breach through your security line at a venue housing both the president and vice president is a valid enough reason to prioritise use of force over clearing a backstop. A larger question I have is why so many people were on that security checkpoint fiddlefucking around such that only one of them was able to react in good time.
27
Wand_Cloak_Stone May 1, 2026 +3
I don’t understand why they were even removing the detectors at the beginning of the event? Wouldn’t you want the [janky ass] security measures there the entire time?
3
TronOld_Dumps May 1, 2026 +28
Were they blanks? Why do damage to the walls in the background.
28
Vashsinn May 1, 2026 +10
No* I was also expecting some driwall or something blasting around but nope. Odd.
10
FuckLex May 1, 2026 +48
Why would you expect that? This isn’t a movie.
48
Kingfisher910 May 1, 2026 +22
True a 9mm would go straight through drywall very easily.. if it were a plaster wall different story
22
Rockman507 May 1, 2026 +7
Speaking of which…. what was behind the wall. This whole thing was a clown show of a shoot.
7
ChunkyBubblz May 1, 2026 +5
That’s standard cop. They’re not bright professionals.
5
FillMySoupDumpling May 1, 2026 +129
So basically there wasn’t really a shooting at the WHCD. They shot at someone, but it was more just a guy running in.
129
GarbagePailGrrrl May 1, 2026 +16
Sean Curran the secret service director was on TV saying the shot was from the shooter shooting someone at point blank range
16
HotBrownFun May 1, 2026 +23
the same people who deleted their text messages on Jan 6. Not credible. Lump in all the prostitution scandals they've had the last 15 years, these are not serious people.
23
StrangeCharmQuark May 1, 2026 +13
With a shotgun? I feel like that would have been more obvious
13
GarbagePailGrrrl May 1, 2026 +3
Lmao imagine
3
[deleted] May 1, 2026 +6
[removed]
6
Civil_Future_2095 May 2, 2026 +2
Oh, the guy that hit Trump's ear with his holster during the first "assassination attempt"?
2
Junethemuse May 1, 2026 +26
So he’s not a shooter.
26
tapeforpacking May 1, 2026 +473
Damn id be kinda pissed off at that officer if I was those other guys. None of those shots even hit the guy 
473
dingostolemydragbaby May 1, 2026 +171
None of those shots hit anything, not even the wall
171
yeahcxnt May 1, 2026 +98
no, it actually hit the officer in his line of fire in the chest. you can see him drop to the floor and another officer drags him out. remember the officer was shot by friendly fire?
98
IrishRage42 May 1, 2026 +36
Well, sometimes bullets just disappear.
36
Spare-Ant7119 May 1, 2026 +7
They disintegrate in the air due to high pressure and temperature. /s
7
mollila May 1, 2026 +37
So it was a false flag with blanks fired?
37
mikerichh May 1, 2026 +83
It is hard for me to understand how they were able to detain him without a single bullet hitting him when he charged the place where the president and the next several people in the line of succession were located while armed They’ll gun down a black kid at a traffic stop or shoot someone in the back but they showed excellent restraint when someone sprints towards the president with 2 or 3 weapons?
83
DFWPunk May 3, 2026 +4
You'd be surprised at just how bad law enforcement is at using their firearms anywhere but the range. When they do hit someone twice it usually means they they emptied their magazine, which is often 19 rounds.
4
PM-Me-Your-Macchiato May 1, 2026 +7
Different day to day interactions on the job might have something to do with it. Yes the Secret Service agents should have actually taken down the threat, but their day to day interactions and feelings are wildly calmer than a cop who is threatened everyday. The anxiety and interactions officers have while on shift makes many of them more prone to wrongfully shooting someone/something because they're on high alert for so long. Secret Service agents posted this far away from the president, at an event like this, and especially under this admin, are probably much more relaxed. They just weren't ready for a threat. Yes, cops should have more (or any) required mental health screenings and therapy. And yes, Secret Service agents should be ready for a threat at all times. But here we are.
7
Area51_Spurs May 1, 2026 +398
Bro just ran past 12 cops/security/secret service and only one even noticed anything was happening. Hahaha. That’s hilarious.
398
Vashsinn May 1, 2026 +288
Bro fire that dog handler what the f***... The dog did it's job and singled him out followed and alerted the handler, even backed away expecting a rection. "Nope must have been the wind " holy shit.
288
MadRaymer May 1, 2026 +143
Police dogs probably get more training than actual police these days.
143
benoxxxx May 1, 2026 +51
The average domestic puppy probably does
51
releaseepsteinfiles1 May 1, 2026 +19
They are also more intelligent than police these days.
19
mboop127 May 1, 2026 +91
Handlers are used to telling the dogs when to signal so they can manufacture probable cause. Not used to listening to real signals.
91
pjsguazzin May 1, 2026 +4
Yeah, police dogs are genuinely incredible animals with great training. But their shit handlers make them less reliable than a coin flip at actually finding anything they're supposed to alert for
4
ohlaohloo May 1, 2026 +2
This reference makes me giggle every time, I can hear it so perfectly haha
2
playfulmessenger May 1, 2026 +10
They were taking down the metal detectors as though the event was over and all the protectees were safely home in bed.
10
grajl May 1, 2026 +7
The one cop by the bench noticed the shooter go down that hallway and was alert and tracking him, then immediately forgot about him and was just looking in the other direction while the shooter ran past. I suspect these are not your traditionally trained secret service.
7
lambofgun May 1, 2026 +4
there are war stories like that. where people just rush an encampment and kill everyone. its not common, but the tactic is so brazen and unexpected it can work sometimes. youre not expecting to see it, theres no warning and so it takes a second to process. might be all u need to get done what you need to get done
4
wetrysohard May 1, 2026 +33
I'm all for knocking what happened as a breach, but they all noticed. He ran right past them. Security is 90% smoke screen, 10% action. He was caught in less than 10 seconds, wasn't he?
33
EggNo289 May 1, 2026 +116
He tripped and fell. That is why they got him. They fired off six shots, and only hit themselves.
116
Magjee May 1, 2026 +9
Yea, a box on the floor tripped him and ended it
9
Area51_Spurs May 1, 2026 +85
Everyone but the one guy noticed once the shots were fired by the cop and he was almost all the way past them. Not a single shot hit the dude. I used to run security for high profile Hollywood events. This is a MASSIVE failure. Don’t get it twisted just how huge a failure this is. When we ran movie premieres we had multiple layers of security people would have to pass thru. You had low level stringers on the sidewalks and outer perimeter and then you had another layer of security past them on the outside of the red carpet. Then you had people on the red carpet and at the entrances and exits. This included the Globes and other events at The Beverly Hilton, which like this location was a hotel open to the public and guests while the event was going on. If this was at the Globes at the Hilton here in Beverly Hills, this guy would have been intercepted at far outer perimeter before entering the hotel or at worst, by someone inside the hotel located in the lobby or the outer service exits and entrances. If this dude was armed with IEDs or grenades and knew what he was doing, he would have stopped before entering this security checkpoint at the entryway in the hallway and thrown explosives or gas/smoke/flashbangs out and either incapacitated or disoriented the security here and then made his way into the ballroom. If he had accomplices he could have done that and flushed POTUS and other HVT’s out thru the exits to be met by other armed individuals. And in addition to what happened in this hallway, way too much time passed from the moment the first shot was fired to the targets being removed from the ballroom. This whole thing was a f****** shitshow and frankly they’re lucky it was just a single untrained crazy idiot and not an individual or group of individuals with training. Keep in mind we’re literally in the middle of a war right now so security should be turned up to 11. All that being said there’s no reason this couldn’t have been easily secured properly and there’s no need for a f****** ballroom and we shouldn’t be making the White House a compound that the public is never allowed access to. The White House was specifically built to belong to the people, just as much as to our elected officials.
85
wetrysohard May 1, 2026 +33
Fact checking here, though. He wasn't on the same floor of the event. Wasn't there more security on the way there? It's a public Hilton, not a secured theater, so hard to compare to other locations.
33
froggertwenty May 1, 2026 +35
You are correct. This was the very first layer of security, on a different floor entirely. The event had already started so this layer was literally in the process of being taken down. Had these guys not stopped him, or as people want to say tripped, he would have ran directly into multiple other layers, narrow hallways, and locked doors, that he could not have gotten through.
35
snoogins355 May 1, 2026 +13
I was in Washington a few weeks ago and you can barely see the white house as a tourist. Beyond the Ellipse to the south, beyond Lafayette Square to the north (renovations?), to the west is a USSS parking lot blocking Pennsylvania Ave and the east has two stories of construction trailers https://imgur.com/a/awqzpQA Edit - you can still request WH tours through your reps offices. I just wanted to tell ol Donny he's #1 with my finger🖕
13
wetrysohard May 1, 2026 +2
Ugh, what jackasses.
2
ReallyNiceDonkey May 1, 2026 +3
The most interest thing about what you mentioned is when you said if he knew what he was doing he could flashbang and grenade these people. Considering drones are the new battlefield threat, imagine if anybody knew anything about operating drones and Ilinfiktrated this event. That's scary as fuh to think about
3
Consistent-Throat130 May 1, 2026 +6
One would assume that there's all sorts of electronic warfare equipment deployed around the facility.  Drones small enough to snuggle into the building are not autonomous, somebody would still need to sit there with a remote control.  Non-issue I think.
6
Area51_Spurs May 1, 2026 +2
Yea. They have jammers and stuff for the drones. At least the consumer ones. They can also geofence locations in the software of a lot of consumer drones. Honestly though, the Secret Service has been so inept the past few years that I would have zero faith in them dealing with any threat rn.
2
ApolloRocketOfLove May 1, 2026 +3
>Security is 90% smoke screen, 10% action. Not really when its the president's security.
3
kna5041 May 1, 2026 +804
Bit of bad journalism if you're calling him a shooter in the title and then go on saying how he didn't shoot. 
804
Dry_Instruction8254 May 1, 2026 +239
Paid by your local billionaire
239
garygnuandthegnus2 May 1, 2026 +73
And all the national news outlets keep calling him a teacher... he was not a teacher.
73
xdrtb May 1, 2026 +15
Teacher tutor, they both start with T so close enough! ^^^/s
15
TheBatemanFlex May 1, 2026 +30
How else will we call education liberal indoctrination?
30
stubob May 1, 2026 +14
Should we call him the shootee?
14
clutchdeve May 1, 2026 +11
Would-be shooter or potential shooter
11
Thief_of_Sanity May 1, 2026 +4
Gun runner
4
HotBrownFun May 1, 2026 +2
it's a bit of a bad look to use "officials say" rather than "officials claim" imo. Guardian has normally been one of the few english-language Trump skeptics left as they aren't within US jurisdiction
2
godsenfrik May 1, 2026 +141
The cop doing the shooting was doing his best stormtrooper impersonation. This was especially lucky for the one in the suit, who was being shot at directly.
141
TMNTerps May 1, 2026 +528
K-9 cop's dog follows him in, handler pulls it away after looking in the room. 1 second later the guy runs out with a gun in hand. Like, what in the f*** is that K-9 Cop doing? Is he just that f****** incompetent that he watches this guy pull a gun out in the other room and walks off? It just looks staged as hell when you see that kind of shit. Then you got Hero Secret Service Cop shooting at the suspect with f****** 6 other people in his line of fire.
528
3xploringforever May 1, 2026 +20
Is that the little makeshift room where the [volunteer](https://nypost.com/2026/04/25/us-news/white-house-correspondents-dinner-gunman-assembled-long-weapon-in-unsecured-room-before-firing-volunteer/) described he put his gun together? And the K-9 cop was just watching him do it and then walked away?
20
TMNTerps May 1, 2026 +7
It has to be, right? No visible gun before he entered, then he suddenly had it out. Unless he walked into another room, inside that room, it looks sketch as hell. Like, I can't rule out Trump's Security details being insanely incompetent since they screen them to make sure they are Trump supporters but man, it just looks so weird.
7
ReallyNiceDonkey May 1, 2026 +86
Yeah that's the part that looks insanely stupid. The k9 officer literally is interacting with the guy faces his direction waving his hand and saying something. Then a SPLIT second after the cop turns away he is turning the corner with the weapon completely armed. He wouldn't have had enough time to pull the weapon out and obviously the officer didn't see the weapon when he is talking to him .6 seconds before he appears to run around the corner. Absolutely diabolical
86
Evinceo May 1, 2026 +43
K9 cop is probably usually using the dog as a probable cause generator on demand... meanwhile it was that dog's finest hour.
43
notasrelevant May 1, 2026 +12
Not to mention an entire security team not looking in the direction people would be entering from.  Like, I get it... Most of the time it's probably pretty mundane. But it is an event the President is attending - you'd think there would be a bit more urgency/focus. It basically seems they are counting on people being scared away by a metal detector.
12
naynaythewonderhorse May 1, 2026 +38
Ahh, but don’t you see? If we have a Ballroom, none of that could possibly happen! The details of this one are irrelevant in the face of having a Ballroom!
38
JUGGER_DEATH May 1, 2026 +133
If I was US SS I would almost want this to be a false flag given the incompetence in full view of the world. Attacker was literally stopped by a misplaced metal box while all the agents managed was scattered friendly fire.
133
rooftopgoblin May 1, 2026 +68
a cop with a dog literally watched him go into the room and even went partially into the room themselves
68
pedal-force May 1, 2026 +65
The dog is like "bro, that dude in there is bad news" for a solid 10 seconds, trying to pull his handler in and alert him, and the handler just, ignores it?
65
UnquestionabIe May 1, 2026 +21
Because the handler was probably confused as he didn't give the signal to generate probable cause.
21
HopandBrew May 1, 2026 +25
This needs to be explained.  All these assassination attempts seem to have examples of incompetent security involved.   
25
AlternativeScratch94 May 1, 2026 +5
The security is just incompetent, that's the explanation.
5
Wand_Cloak_Stone May 1, 2026 +5
Honestly rewatching with it zoomed in on the room/dog/k9 cop makes it look like more than just incompetence. The cop was following behind the suspect with his dog just before the suspect enters the room - if you look to the left of the column you see the suspect pass it, and then the cop and dog pass it just a second or two later. The cop was clearly already walking behind him. Then the cop just stops in front of the doorway and stares into the room. His dog goes fully through the doorway, and the cop holds it back while continuing to stare. At one point it even looks like the cop says something. Then the cop just gives up and turns away and starts to walk in the opposite direction one second before the suspect starts racing back out. Like wtf was that. Dude fully looks like he just didn’t want it to be his problem.
5
ry15133 May 1, 2026 +7
Either that, or they’re in on it
7
onlyforsellingthisPC May 3, 2026 +2
never attribute to malice, honestly. Multiple people dropped the ball here.
2
Enumeration May 1, 2026 +15
Anyone else see the canine follow him to the door, I’m not a trained handler but that seemed like maybe a sign
15
Modern_Bear May 1, 2026 +36
>The video was posted shortly after US Secret Service director Sean Curran told Pirro’s former employer Fox News that Allen was stopped not by Secret Service gunfire, but by a box used to transport a metal detector, which he tripped over as he ran through a checkpoint outside the venue. >Curran confirmed that Allen was not hit by any of the five shots fired at him by a Secret Service agent. The assailant was boxed in and brought down. Give that box a 🏅
36
RoddBanger May 1, 2026 +46
How she missed shooting anyone is crazy and all the other idiots standing around BSing instead of doing their jobs is wild. Pulling security is just that ffs. 'So anyway I started blastin' - [Frank Reynolds](https://youtu.be/4e6IKG2Xxzw?si=kd3DQLBymVXPqUZB&t=3)
46
CourierFive May 1, 2026 +44
When people say Stormtroopers bad aim is unbelievable, show them this. This was some Pulp Fiction "Divine Intervention" moment, right here. The only way this could get funnier, would be if the casing from the fired shots hit the runner in the eye, as he ran pass the cop shooting at him point blank, and he yelled "Ah, my eye", which caused him to trip over those boxes that stopped him. He was that close for the first 3 shots, his clothes are covered with gunshot residue.
44
Malfeitor1 May 1, 2026 +17
Just think, this guy had a days long train ride across the entire country to think this out and his ultimate plan was to Leeroy Jenkins it
17
RazorRamonWWF May 1, 2026 +2
i think leeroy needs something from this guy
2
Maoleficent May 1, 2026 +8
After he was able to check into the hotel with weapons and come down flights of stairs with no resistance. Run the tape of the agent shooting the other agent. That's still under investigation until they can make up a plausible lie that it wasn't 'friendly' fire. What a stupid term.
8
Interesting_Pain37 May 1, 2026 +7
F*** the officials, I don’t trust them
7
Moist-Sky7607 May 1, 2026 +7
He wasn’t even on the same floor, he never “stormed the dinner”
7
rockerscott May 1, 2026 +56
Yeah aren’t there supposed to be multiple layers of security? Typically they are checking people before they even enter the block radius of an event like this.
56
UnfortunatelyMacabre May 1, 2026 +97
One of the things we’re coming to find out over the more recent incidents that involve SS is that the agency is uh, not quite what we’ve been told. More and more, it’s seeming like they are as similarly effective at preventing crime as their other counterpart law enforcement agencies.
97
__O_o_______ May 1, 2026 +41
Remember the fuckery with Pence not wanting to get into a secret service car on Jan 6? Whatever happened with that?
41
principalman May 1, 2026 +51
Remember when the same agency "lost" every record related to January 6? And then Congress said , "that's fine , boys."
51
UnquestionabIe May 1, 2026 +7
Yep. The handling of January 6th was a complete shit show and embarrassment on every level. If anything was more complex than "arrest the people we can prove were there" it was dropped the moment it ran into any push back. The ringleaders didn't even get a slap on the wrist and the sitting members of government involved faced no consequences because holding traitors accountable might look "too partisan". If you can meet an unprecedented threat with actions beyond business as usual then you've already failed.
7
ajmartin527 May 1, 2026 +77
\> not quite what we’ve been told. I think it’s more like “not quite what they used to be.” All of the highly capable, highly experienced agents have been weeded out and replaced with sycophants who pledge absolute fealty to the regime.
77
Cool_Flamingo6779 May 1, 2026 +22
I mean they have a long history of embarrassing failure and scandals. They've never been good at their jobs.
22
[deleted] May 1, 2026 +3
[removed]
3
Wulfkat May 1, 2026 +18
The rot at Secret Service can be directly attributed to them being DHS instead of Treasury (which is a) where they belong as their secondary job is prosecuting money laundering and fraud and b) they were a lot more professional in Treasury).
18
DingerSinger2016 May 1, 2026 +11
Please use USSS as the abbreviation for Secret Service. SS would imply another organization that was in Germany.
11
FreeHKTaiwanNumber1 May 1, 2026 +17
It implies there is another organization in the US. The Stupid Service
17
ButterscotchTop194 May 1, 2026 +16
SS is even more appropriate then.
16
Consistent-Throat130 May 1, 2026 +2
The double entendre is largely intended with the current presidency.
2
ButterscotchTop194 May 1, 2026 +8
The suspect mentioned exactly this. There was some checks before this but more just protestor type low key checks. He couldn't believe how shit the security was.
8
Crombus_ May 1, 2026 +5
Stop calling it a shooting, he didn't fire a shot
5
stevedaher May 1, 2026 +116
Been in security installations over 20 years, never called a camera “camera 1” ever. It makes it difficult to find footage or bring up any sort of meaningful views without going into every camera first. That font is synonymous with the brand Hikvision. It’s a low cost Chinese brand banned by the US Government for government applications.
116
DookieShoez May 1, 2026 +111
It’s probably the hilton hotel’s camera, since they’re at the hilton hotel in DC. They can probably use whatever cameras they like I would imagine.
111
Saorren May 1, 2026 +37
im about 8 years into emergency services involving c*** systems and you would be surprised just how many people number them with nothing else.
37
CoinReturn May 1, 2026 +13
Site I worked at was bought out by a Fortune 50 company that came in an renamed our descriptive cameras with just numbers. Was a pain in the ass.
13
Rylegit1 May 1, 2026 +7
I mean, the places I’ve worked security had cameras labeled by number. So definitely it’s in the realm of possibility But it’s definitely not convenient for anybody except the staff that’s familiar with them.
7
majesticalexis May 1, 2026 +72
Can we stop calling him a shooter. He didn’t fire a single shot.
72
must-be-thursday May 1, 2026 +11
Is it just me, or do none of the agents come across particularly well in this video? Firstly there's the dog handler. The dog seems to think something is up; the handler appears to at the very least look at, if not chat with, Allen, before moving away. OK maybe Allen was convincing enough that the cop didn't suspect anything, but you'd think if you've got a sniffer dog, you might pay a bit more attention when it gives you a sign. Then we've got Mr Trigger Happy. In his defence, he's the only person that seems even vaguely awake and reacts quickly. That said, his aim must be pretty terrible, and he also seems completely oblivious to the potential of hitting one of the other agents. Maybe I'm being harsh - I can see the argument that given the circumstances, the risk of friendly fire is worth paying to stop a would-be gunman. But I think the worst has to be Mr Oblivious Suit. There's no sound so unclear if anyone was yelling, but he doesn't seem to react at all until Mr Trigger Happy fires his first shot. It certainly seems to me that Mr Trigger Happy drawing his gun ought to have caught his attention much sooner.
11
ButterscotchTop194 May 1, 2026 +31
Why didnt that officer get in the way, body block, or make any attempt to physically stop him? Instead he decided to loose some terrible aimed blanks that all missed? What a f****** clown show.
31
okimlom May 1, 2026 +8
They could’ve stuck out their leg to trip the guy and been more effective.
8
TheBatemanFlex May 1, 2026 +4
Cops are cowards. If they can't shoot someone that isn't shooting back, they want no part of it.
4
xChoke1x May 1, 2026 +3
And secret service fire into everyone else but him. Lol
3
eyeroll611 May 1, 2026 +11
They could have easily tackled him to the ground if they weren’t so busy shooting.
11
PigFarmer1 May 1, 2026 +5
Paying attention would have been helpful.
5
BubblyFlow6143 May 1, 2026 +21
Why are they taking down the metal detectors while the event was barely getting going?
21
MachineCloudCreative May 1, 2026 +13
I think the idea is once the event is going, nobody else should be going in. So break down all infrastructure asap to facilitate quicker exit if needed. It's just efficient to get it out of the way once it's no longer necessary. How lax everything else is, considering how wacky everything is these days? That's a different story all around.
13
cardboardunderwear May 1, 2026 +4
The only thing missing is a box of donuts. What a joke.
4
NiceRockyship May 1, 2026 +5
And the moment that the only injury occurred from blue on blue crossfire.
5
PigFarmer1 May 1, 2026 +3
"I'll just fire into a crowd of my coworkers."
3
Blubbolo May 1, 2026 +135
No security, no one checking anything, no metal detector, Naruto run. They knew and let that shit happen to then post about needing the ballroom and the Americans needing to pay it with their taxes.
135
Relish_My_Weiner May 1, 2026 +40
So we're just making stuff up now? He was literally apprehended by security after tripping over a metal detector box.
40
dformed May 1, 2026 +105
No, it's worse. The security successfully apprehended him before he could do anything. Their lax security was successful, therefore they need the ball-bunker.
105
Ok-disaster2022 May 1, 2026 +68
Apparently in his manifesto one of things he complains about is their lack of security. He never should have been allowed in that hotel or he should have been relocated to another hotel. Instead he checks in with a massive obviously large weapon and no one stops him, check him or anything. Dude was on an FBI watch list and able to check into a hotel a president would be at. 
68
squeezemachine May 1, 2026 +9
I worked at a hotel where the Clinton Global initiative was held. This is after his presidency. The guest list of the 2,000 room hotel was scoured by secret service as well as the backgrounds of our employees. Certain employees had to stay home during the multi day event. Odd that this guy was able to keep his reservation or not watched or something.
9
Drugba May 1, 2026 +55
The f*** are you talking about no security or metal detectors? The headline photo in the article is a photo of him running through a metal detector with like 10 officers right there. The metal detector is literally the closest thing on his left side, right side, and above him in the photo. The people who stopped him were the security.
55
Watabou May 1, 2026 +10
Seek help
10
OG_Williker May 1, 2026 +12
Just looks like a guided tour to me
12
Koffeinberoende May 1, 2026 +8
Bro saw the Scientolgy Speed Run videos and wanted to try it himself.
8
blifflesplick May 2, 2026 +2
Its looking more and more like that, the hotel has a 3d walkthrough online and the "room" he stepped into for a few seconds? Not a room, a hallway. I think he got lost, cue Benny Hill theme
2
UnstableMabel May 1, 2026 +3
Oh wow. I forgot all about this.
3
That_Communication71 May 1, 2026 +3
So how did he get his shirt off while running and shooting?
3
phosdick May 1, 2026 +3
>While the video does show four muzzle flashes from an agent’s gun as he fired at Allen, it was not immediately clear whether it showed Allen discharging his weapon after he pointed it at the agent. Sure looks to me like there were no shots fired by the "shooter" (who, I believe, belongs in jail regardless)... irrespective of what some dubiously sober Federal Prosecutor may have claimed.
3
showtimebabies May 1, 2026 +3
I wonder when we'll see the rest of the footage.
3
Ms_Apprehend May 1, 2026 +3
Let’s do a thought experiment my friends. What if an agency established to protect high ranking government officials detects a plot against one of those officials, and instead of stopping said plot, allows it to unfold, with a plan to stop it at the last minute? Why? To allow this official to reap sympathy, show victimization by the “other side” and further enhance the image of a “brave” and undeterred leader. Hmmmm. Interesting.
3
Dudeist-Priest May 1, 2026 +5
The whole administration from top to bottom is incompetent
5
Ser_Jaime_Lannister May 1, 2026 +6
The president is in there but the halls are empty and the only people defending the entire place are condensed into one spot, standing around bullshitting like a bar night smoke circle. Okay.
6
29187765432569864 May 1, 2026 +3
our high school had better security at high school dances.
3
Moneyshot_ITF May 1, 2026 +12
He wasn't the shooter. Secret service was
12
McTee967 May 1, 2026 +12
At this point I think he should be known as an intruder rather than a shooter until they actually come up with some evidence that he actually fired a shot.
12
MagmaTroop May 1, 2026 +5
If you’re a cop and you’re running away, why are you even a cop
5
JoeBarra May 1, 2026 +6
Is there a reason why the guy in the suit jumped out of the way instead of attempting to tackle him?
6
Del_3030 May 1, 2026 +12
What, the guy in the $20,000 suit is supposed to stop the assailant? Come on!
12
Brave_Mess_3155 May 1, 2026 +3
What's the matter? Are you chicken?  Coo coo ca cha!
3
Raphe-Perineal May 1, 2026 +2
All the SSA and cops coming out with guns drawn like a swarm of angry hornets when someone throws a rock at their nest.
2
travisoutwest May 1, 2026 +2
The dude in the middle's mind started to wander at the worst possible moment. I can only imagine what he was thinking, "Damn this is boring as hell, I want to see some action!".
2
StBean007 May 2, 2026 +2
ABC News is terrible at explaining things. Said shooter was shot at 5 times but wasn’t hit and noted he was wearing tactical vest, almost as if trying to imply the reason he wasn’t hit was because of the tactical vest. Not a bullet proof vest, but tactical vest, though one could also be hit even with a bullet proof vest.
2
jy3 May 2, 2026 +2
The k9 handler must be so mad at himself. The DOG CLEARLY indicated that something was sus, probably smelled something. He pulled the dog back TWICE. This footage should be studied and the guy go back into training.
2
DirtDevil1337 May 2, 2026 +2
Why did we see a blurry and shaky version of this video first and now it's clear like it's brand new?
2
PropertyDisruptor May 1, 2026 +3
It's wonderful that the first thing to happen when I click the post is a giant ad from the guardian asking me 'what is your source for news?' Well, it was going to be you until I get a bullshit advertisement instead of a news story when I click a link to your site.
3
chefdangerdagger May 1, 2026 +6
This footage is absolutely damning. There was nothing sophisticated here, just a guy with a gun running past a bunch of security officers who were not paying any attention.
6
TeamHope4 May 1, 2026 +12
The officer with the K-9 should be fired. The dog followed the intruder into that room, twice, and the officer looks through the doorway and pulls the dog away just seconds before the intruder runs out of that same doorway.
12
pizzlepullerofkberg May 1, 2026 +3
Whenever Trump is really failing on the issues he tries to gin up division even more with these bogus attempts.
3
rp3rsaud May 1, 2026 +3
Turns out the gun ~~fired~~ carried by the ~~shooter~~ runner matched the bullets fired at the previous assassination attempt.
3
honest_flowerplower May 1, 2026 +2
Same video that has been circulating, minus the 1990 CCTV 'filter'. It is now clear enough to see the suspect IS carrying a long gun, but does not show 'allegedly tripping over box', or a 'nakedown' of the suspect. The global speculation will assuredly continue. Anyone know where the suit in stairway is running to? (watch doors in upper right, he kinda looks like he's dropping to the floor, as other suits exit through doorway). -Old enough to remember when a journalist/news outlet would give some idea of the building layout, in explaining how an arrested suspect WAS a threat to the targets.
2
SatanMango May 1, 2026 +2
What a shit title. "Video shows moment police allowed shooter into White House dinner" is a better title.
2
← Back to Board