· 200 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 20, 2026 at 7:49 PM

What is the new Scrubs getting right that the new Frasier got wrong?

Posted by bonshui


https://www.listnook.com/r/television/comments/1rz6asm/what_is_the_new_scrubs_getting_right_that_the_new/

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Andrew1990M Mar 20, 2026 +1411
Brought back more of what we wanted back.  Fraiser without Niles and Martin isn’t right. 
1411
BritishHobo Mar 20, 2026 +253
They should have done what they did with the original Frasier in the first place, and carve out an entirely new dynamic and set-up. By trying to mimic the strained father/son dynamic and making Niles' son an imitation of Niles, they fucked themselves over by constantly reminding everyone of the original. They shoulda just done something completely different.
253
Andrew1990M Mar 20, 2026 +117
Yeah, the Niles's son character with absolutely zero Niles or Daphne served only to make you miss them more. And just giving Fraiser the same vein of culture clash with his son as he did with his father just made you miss Marty more, and made it seem like Fraiser learnt nothing in the years spent living with him. You weren't actively missing the Cheers gang in Fraiser, so they needed to change the basic premise more, probably even change the name of the show again. Hell even going back to making it a bar ensemble featuring Fraiser would have been more interesting.
117
ColonelBy Mar 20, 2026 +140
> Hell even going back to making it a bar ensemble featuring Fraiser would have been more interesting. Give us a show where his retirement from psychiatry and the radio leaves him feeling directionless, lonely, and rapidly spiralling into a late-life crisis -- so when he notices a local bar is for sale he makes an uncharacteristically impulsive bid, becomes the new owner, and ends up splitting his time between the back office and behind the bar. Have him struggle with his desire to make it a high-end establishment but faced with a constant stream of working-joe / hipster customers and zany staff. Have him forced to learn how to change, even late in life, and to learn that he may even like it. And **absolutely** have his customers bend his ear about their problems. 
140
briareus08 Mar 20, 2026 +30
Shit I’d watch that.
30
DingoFrisky Mar 20, 2026 +39
Tha also has a great circular element where he goes from a bar (Cheers) to psychiatrist And then to a bar where he’s the patrons ‘psychiatrist’ and on the other side of the bar
39
CosmackMagus Mar 21, 2026 +8
Poetry
8
BrianMincey Mar 20, 2026 +10
The Harvard stuff was always cringe. The sets were tiny and none of it felt even remotely real. At least the radio show and work dynamic seemed real.
10
dotcomse Mar 20, 2026 +10
And when he thinks his barkeep wisdom has found an epiphany, he reaches over the bar, tips the glass up into his customer’s mouth and says “I think that’s our beer.”
10
aaBabyDuck Mar 20, 2026 +6
Uncharacteristically impulsive bid?? Thats 100% in line with his character.
6
OneOfThemLostaPen Mar 21, 2026 +3
Approved for Production
3
bork63nordique Mar 21, 2026 +3
Jesus...why aren't you in Hollywood right now?
3
KL_boy Mar 20, 2026 +11
What I am missing is the pompousness being popped, the very smart writing, the interaction between the brothers, Niles just being Niles….  The problem is that they tried to create the same dynamics, but with different people.. not the same 
11
dthains_art Mar 20, 2026 +38
Frasier in Space
38
jaybizzleeightyfour Mar 20, 2026 +22
Frasier X
22
dotcomse Mar 20, 2026 +10
Freddy vs Frasier
10
BreakAtmo Mar 21, 2026 +3
I mean we did kinda get that...
3
randompersonE Mar 20, 2026 +7
Frasier: But They’re In Space!
7
OkBumblebeer Mar 21, 2026 +5
I actually think they could have leaned into it more. Have Frasier lose the majority of his money and have to move in with Freddie and be humbled by the new simpler lifestyle he now has to learn how to live.  So it would have flipped things around with him basically in the Marty role and given the character something new to do.  Instead they just made him rich as f*** and he even bragged about it and that probably doesn't sit well with today's audience where everyone is poor as f***
5
LibertyCash Mar 20, 2026 +30
I think this is it. Imagine scrubs just being Zach Braff with no one else. It’s a completely different show. Noah Wyle cracked it.
30
dotcomse Mar 20, 2026 +5
“That lady is gonna sue us if we hire Eriq La Salle!”
5
Derp35712 Mar 20, 2026 +116
Frazier seemed like a totally bland sitcom with Kelsey Grammer. It didn’t seem like the original Frazier at all. Did they have different writers too.
116
jack3moto Mar 20, 2026 +65
Well knowing the show came off the air 22 years ago, I have to imagine most of those writers have retired
65
j01101111sh Mar 20, 2026 +43
Shit, half are probably dead given that some probably came over from cheers
43
[deleted] Mar 20, 2026 +10
[deleted]
10
lcsulla87gmail Mar 20, 2026 +6
1 of the 3 head writers have passed away. But all 3 would be in their 70s
6
ascagnel____ Mar 20, 2026 +9
Yeah, but the one that passed away died while the show was still running (and was in one of the planes that hit the WTC on 9/11). 
9
cicidoh Mar 20, 2026 +9
The original creators have either passed away or retired but a lot of the writers are still working. Looks like some even worked on the reboot
9
Ponderer13 Mar 20, 2026 +5
Ken Levine, one of the co-creators, is still working and he had some…choice things to say. [https://screenrant.com/frasier-revival-original-writer-ken-levine-criticism/](https://screenrant.com/frasier-revival-original-writer-ken-levine-criticism/)
5
NickofSantaCruz Mar 20, 2026 +7
Season 2 was better. The stories in general felt more like something we'd see from the original run. Bringing Roz back more did help in that department, and for the most part did not feel like she was shoehorned in to each episode. It felt like they were setting up for Season 3 to be more back to the OG formula: turn Frasier into a live podcaster.
7
LowBalance4404 Mar 20, 2026 +9
Concise and correct answer. I think they could have gotten away without Martin (and obviously, they would have had to), but no Niles too? Those two made that show.
9
spongeboy1985 Mar 20, 2026 +21
Fraiser succeeded because it didnt try to be Cheers and was pretty good on its own. They should have went that route with the third series and didn’t try to be
21
RadVarken Mar 20, 2026 +23
I wonder. A sequel to Cheers, not Frasier, is the thing that would have worked. Frasier moves back to the city, dad is dead, brother isn't around. He's not the up and coming guy in a bad marriage he once was, but he finds himself at the bar every day. It'd still be his show, but in the pub, coffee shop or whatever other third place the producers decide upon. Guest appearances by the old cast of either series, and functionally a showcase for upcoming actors set in the familiar clothes of Frasier's world.
23
Jodenaje Mar 20, 2026 +782
I haven't seen the new Frasier but I'm enjoying the new Scrubs. IMO, what it's getting right is that it still has the same feel as the original series. Yes, there are new characters, and yes the old characters are in new roles and new stages in their lives. But it still has the same humor and the same great dialogue as the original. It feels like we're watching a continuation of the old Scrubs we knew and loved. Some reboots (again, I haven't seen the new Frasier) make it feel like a totally different show, which is generally disappointing to the fans tuning in for the nostalgia factor.
782
cgio0 Mar 20, 2026 +582
Also, Scrubs has been so smart what so many reboots/ constitutions do is fold in the “kids” or niece/nephew and it throws it off JD and Elliot have a kid we have not met yet and we are 5 eps in. We only saw Turk’s kids for like 5 seconds That’s amazing, cause kids are not funny or relevant in a show like this
582
m0rgend0rfer Mar 20, 2026 +131
I normally hugely agree with the widespread “new kid characters, meh” sentiment. Only personal exception I can think of is the little Jack bits in the OG.   “I pooped in my bed, so I put it on the TV” always gets me lol 
131
hotsizzler Mar 20, 2026 +47
Thats because he occupied a role less of a character and more as a stressor for Cox. JD and Elliot dont need that.
47
Trickshot1322 Mar 20, 2026 +17
Jack was an developed plot point, from not being there to conception, birth, childhood. Fatherhood was a genuine issue for Dr Cox, and the whole deceit around it was also a plot point for his character. It all contributed to his character being softer.
17
Andybabez20 Mar 20, 2026 +82
I also feel we hardly ever saw Turk/Carla and JD/Kim's children in the original series either. They only popped up maybe once every 10 episodes.
82
oneyaebyonty Mar 20, 2026 +45
I completely forgot about JD and Kim’s kid!
45
D34THDE1TY Mar 20, 2026 +20
He's the one that can show up he'd be of med school age now...I think
20
21letternameonly Mar 20, 2026 +8
lol no way he’d be in med school. Sam was born in like 2007-2008, at best he’d be a junior in college.
8
KingVengeance Mar 20, 2026 +3
So did he
3
MeatTornado25 Mar 20, 2026 +2
We did see Cox & Jordan's son a lot though
2
FeloniousDrunk101 Mar 20, 2026 +27
Sort of what made Top Gun: Maverick work was not trying to shoehorn the old character into a new role. Maverick wasn’t a teacher, he was a pilot so that’s what he’s going to do and that’s what we’re there to watch.
27
Jodenaje Mar 20, 2026 +20
Good point. That's probably what helps to keep the feel of the original sitcom. We know they have kids, but they are not a focal point of the show.
20
BrianMincey Mar 20, 2026 +9
The worst is the sassy smart kid trope, where everything a little kid says just doesn’t jive with reality. Kids do and say really stupid things that generally aren’t funny to adults.
9
TheFoolman Mar 21, 2026 +5
Cox’s Jack jack was like this in og series. Most of his actions and lines are just silly kid stuff and the comedy was more from situations and reactions
5
Stillwater215 Mar 20, 2026 +4
It’s not that they’re “not funny,” it’s that they’re not the characters we came back to see. I don’t really care about JDs kids, or Turks kids. I want to know what JD and Turk have been up to since we last saw them. Maybe they introduce the kids as minor characters, but they shouldn’t be folded in right from the start.
4
JamStan1978 Mar 20, 2026 +4
I would still like to have an episode here and there that focuses on them as parents, just not make it the whole show you know?
4
tagen Mar 20, 2026 +37
yep, i was legit grinning from ear to ear the entire first 2 episodes (now im just waiting to binge the rest) it just felt like i was watching more of the original, just like season 25 or something lol only thing i didn’t like was the animosity and divorce of JD and Elliot, but im also not terribly surprised, the writers never let them stay together long
37
The_Razielim Mar 20, 2026 +8
I think it works though. They were always a long shot. The (original) final season made such a huge plot point of them *trying* to learn from past mistakes and let go of the petty stupid shit and the games, but also the fact that... They can't. Elliot was still obsessive and controlling, JD was still a free spirit to the point of immaturity and stupidity... They *tried* to work around it, but it was a long shot. The most out of character aspect of what we've seen of their breakup was JD being the one criticizing the way Elliot loaded the dishwasher...
8
tagen Mar 20, 2026 +3
no i agree, it makes sense that they didn’t work out in the long haul, i just really wanted them too lol
3
pmacnayr Mar 20, 2026 +22
They turned Frasier into a modern sitcom, which was neat but not what I was looking for at all, Scrubs still feels just like Scrubs
22
somecasper Mar 20, 2026 +75
My only complaint is that they sucked every ounce of joy out of Elliot. To be fair, that started somewhere around season 6. What I wouldn't give to hear the "frick!" back in her voice.
75
tarrsk Mar 20, 2026 +77
I really like what they’ve done with Elliot so far. She’s still neurotic, but she’s also far more confident. They’ve successfully de-Flanderized her for the most part.
77
MeatTornado25 Mar 20, 2026 +4
I felt like they had already reached that point by the time the show originally ended.
4
UsedToiletWater Mar 20, 2026 +21
I wanna see her cry in the closet 😭
21
laundry_dumper Mar 20, 2026 +16
I think it's somewhat realistic. JD is having difficulty in that area too. Isn't implied the divorce is still very recent?
16
SteelOliver Mar 20, 2026 +14
It's been at least a year. They gave a timeline in the 1st episode
14
laundry_dumper Mar 20, 2026 +24
A year is still fresh for a divorce. A theme of this season is JD and Elliot learning how to move on.
24
dromtrund Mar 20, 2026 +16
Feels more like season 9 of scrubs than season 9 of scrubs ever did
16
KR_Blade Mar 20, 2026 +16
the biggest complaint i hear universally from Frasier is quite simply the series just does not work at all without Niles, that was one of the biggest things people loved about the original series was the chemistry between Frasier and Niles
16
worm600 Mar 21, 2026 +5
Frasier was an ensemble show that requires other characters to be foils to Frasier himself, who wasn’t really all that entertaining by himself. Niles, his father, and Daphne punctured his sense of superiority and showed how absurd he could be at his core.
5
AmbulanceChaser12 Mar 20, 2026 +25
I'm looking at you, Picard....
25
WySLatestWit Mar 20, 2026 +39
It's telling that Picard only really got anyone to like it when they finally committed to being a continuation of TNG with the TNG characters instead of running around trying to resemble, seemingly, everything except TNG.
39
AmbulanceChaser12 Mar 20, 2026 +11
And I was one of those people!
11
WySLatestWit Mar 20, 2026 +16
Same! It's almost infuriating seeing how genuinely good season 3 was and thinking, "Why the hell did it take 3 seasons to get here?"
16
dedokta Mar 20, 2026 +5
They forgot who Picard was. Instead of the commanding, stern but fair, sure of himself Captain that saved the universe multiple times, we got a dottering grandpa looking for his slippers.
5
vadergeek Mar 21, 2026 +2
Patrick Stewart was 80, you can't have him still in command of a starship.
2
ButthurtBilly Mar 20, 2026 +19
I don't know, I thought their portrayal of Picard as a sad, lonely old man getting into shootouts with regular cops in modern-day Los Angeles was *very* faithful to the character's origins as a badass far-future warrior-philosopher solving intergalactic turmoil with the power of diplomacy, logic, and the cooperation of his loyal crew of spacefaring super-geniuses. You can pretty much draw a direct line from Picard carrying the weight of experiencing the dying days of an entire civilization in the blink of an eye, and the lingering pain and guilt of being stripped of his humanity and forced to massacre his friends and comrades as the unwitting pawn of an unfeeling machine-mind, to him getting run over by Brent Spiner's Tesla Model X in a Hyatt Regency parking lot and going into a coma where he's mad at his dad. It's a real Joseph Campbell, Monomyth, Hero's Journey-type thing. Call to adventure, challenges and temptations, transformation, atonement, run over by an electric roadster going 7mph in a hotel parking lot. You see that same pattern all over the place in classical mythology if you know where to look for it. >!I hate this stupid f****** show so much. It's been five years and I'm still pissed that I sat through all that.!<
19
pizzapizzamesohungry Mar 20, 2026 +3
Is this real?
3
ButthurtBilly Mar 20, 2026 +8
I truly wish it weren't. And please keep in mind, dear reader, I *left out* most of the dumb parts. I didn't even *mention* that the entire season was an elaborately-orchestrated plot by Q to convince him to bang his recently-widowed hot Romulan maid, who he dumps offscreen in the following season because Crusher comes back. That said, there are no Teslas or indeed electric vehicles of any kind mentioned explicitly in *The Hero with a Thousand Faces*, no.
8
Necro926 Mar 20, 2026 +11
Thats exactly why season 3 is the only good season
11
Reylo-Wanwalker Mar 20, 2026 +2
And then there's Twin Peaks The Return.
2
clarkision Mar 20, 2026 +5
The opening credits nails this. Same vibe, same exact song, but updated with new characters and old, to the point that instead of hanging up the X-Ray, JD just slides it from the iPad to the other device. We really are just picking up from later down the road
5
alek_hiddel Mar 20, 2026 +8
Frasier was a completely different show. Classic Frasier was one of the best ensemble casts of all time, and honestly Kelsey Grammer was one of the weaker parts. So of course for the new series we completely uproot the character back to Boston, and bring on a couple of the old cast a couple of times for guest star appearances. Kelsey was giving the same performance as always, but didn’t have the amazing screen partners to make it work.
8
amurica1138 Mar 21, 2026 +3
I think this is exactly right. They did not realize how important the supporting cast was. Frasier focused exclusively on Kelsey Grammar and an otherwise completely new cast - big difference. Scrubs returns almost all the OG cast (save those no longer among the living).
3
TeHHaMMeR19 Mar 20, 2026 +3
Agreed. I mean in the first episode JD leaps into Turks arms, which is classic Scrubs imo. However, it's update to reflect their age by making a joke about how it hurt the both of them! The Todd is still the Todd, which actually made me lol during the HR scene. It's just fun
3
Boggie135 Mar 20, 2026 +4
The abandoned Hospital they used to shoot in was demolished so they found a building and did the exterior exactly as the old one. Expanded all the rooms inside and added floors in post production
4
venus974 Mar 20, 2026 +2
Do you think Will and Grace get it right?
2
Wormvortex Mar 20, 2026 +2
I thought the new Will and Grace episodes were great.
2
LaurenLdfkjsndf Mar 20, 2026 +2
“It feels like we’re watching a continuation of the old Scrubs we knew and loved” I told my husband that I felt like the show had never stopped - it was so similar to past seasons
2
StudsTurkleton Mar 20, 2026 +125
A few points: Zach talked about this some right at launch on their Fake Doctors Real Friends podcast. He said they’ve done this recent rewatch which gave them real insight looking back at what episodes worked, what didn’t, where they drifted, etc. He said they were pretty honest with themselves about what episodes fell flat. He also said they were basically doing a giant focus group about the show with the podcast, being very fan interactive. They had their finger on the pulse of the fans’ feelings. Then he really studied other reboots. Two things he said to avoid: 1) young Scrubs, just getting a young Turk and Young JD. 2) A full nostalgia-fest running back old Scrubs. He put a lot of work in to find the right balance, the characters have to have moved forward. But the essence still had to be there. New characters had to be unique and true to now. He said they realized they had to re-ground the show. They slipped and some fantasy elements were outside of fantasy by the end (kangaroos with kanga hats, being stuffed in a backpack), so they would re-set fantasy as fantasy. I think those things, Bill Lawrence being involved, and getting most of the cast back to varying degrees. I miss Ted. Hooch is crazy.
125
Jester-252 Mar 20, 2026 +57
Just on that I have to highlight Vanessa Bayer as Sibby, the HR head. She is giving the character strong Ted energy without just being a rehash of Ted. She has taken on Sam Lloyd scene stealing one liner role.
57
StudsTurkleton Mar 20, 2026 +26
At first I was worried she’d be annoyingly 1 note, but lately with the gambling and break room she’s becoming that fun weird side character between Ted and Jan Itor Edit to add: they need a new hospital lawyer. The lawyer can’t have been a big part of hospital life before and now zip, for the COM especially. They also haven’t even mentioned Ted have they? It’d be nice if there was a painting or plaque to him JD notices.
26
pinkkittenfur Mar 21, 2026 +7
The absence of Dr. Jan Itor makes me sad. I hope he pops up.
7
Sagacious_Zhu Mar 21, 2026 +2
That is *DR.* Jan Itor, to you! 
2
Ink_Smudger Mar 20, 2026 +13
> 2) A full nostalgia-fest running back old Scrubs. He put a lot of work in to find the right balance, the characters have to have moved forward. But the essence still had to be there. New characters had to be unique and true to now. It feels more like a continuation than trying to lean on nostalgia. JD has come back to Sacred Heart, but for Elliot, Turk, Carla, Todd, Hooch, etc., life just went on after the show ended, and now we're getting to see what they've been up to. There are changes since they're further along in their careers, but it feels natural and kept the dynamic the same. There was no effort to "modernize" the show or come up with some major moment to reintroduce us. It's sort of the same premise *King of the Hill* took with Hank and Peggy returning, but Arlen was still chugging along in their absence. If you're going to bring back a show, you have to remain faithful to it, because otherwise what audience are you trying to appeal to?
13
PeteA84 Mar 20, 2026 +502
Heart. Scrubs isn't perfect by any means, but it's mostly got the tone right that will hopefully give it enough time to work out the bits of character that needs tweaking.
502
billythygoat Mar 20, 2026 +41
They could’ve survived without JD but the main core needs to be the same. Now that they have the main 3 people, and Todd occasionally, it’s been hitting the spots.
41
JMJ05 Mar 20, 2026 +93
> They could’ve survived without JD but the main core needs to be the same. Can you elaborate on this? I feel like I'm not understanding what you mean here. Scrubs without JD is like saying Frasier without Fraiser
93
MrMo2112 Mar 20, 2026 +20
That is Sacred :-)
20
FranklynTheTanklyn Mar 20, 2026 +25
Heh Sacred Fart.
25
TurtleRockDuane Mar 20, 2026 +10
My wife and I both truly liked the Frazier reboot. Thought it was an especially good show. Looked forward to each new episode. I am blind to why others didn’t find it enjoyable other than preconceived expectations. Taken on its own, I think it’s an excellent show.
10
Matches_Malone83 Mar 20, 2026 +12
That Christmas episode in the 1st season was classic Frasier. Honestly though, not having Niles or Daphne and then not bringing Ros on until later really hurt for people not even wanting to try it out.
12
haunted_patient Mar 21, 2026 +3
I'm in agreement. While not quite on the same level as the first 6-7 seasons of the show, I thought it was better than the last several seasons of the original run. And as far as reboots go, id say its pretty good compared to a lot of them
3
ashehudson Mar 20, 2026 +11
People dont like Kelsey Grammer anymore because he supports Trump.
11
Your__Pal Mar 20, 2026 +4
It feels really odd considering he has played a well educated therapist/professor from  Boston/Seattle for 20 years.  I am sure a different version of Grammer could have gotten Pierce back for atleast a few cameos.
4
uraniummusic Mar 20, 2026 +447
Niles’ absence from the reboot was deafening.
447
bkos55 Mar 20, 2026 +142
And Martin. The overall ensemble was weaker and felt more on par with a TV Land original.
142
weirdoldhobo1978 Mar 20, 2026 +26
They couldn't get the band back together 
26
Kevbot1000 Mar 20, 2026 +50
Niles being in it would have made up for no Martin. Freddy was honestly a solid replacement for him.
50
SimpleSimon665 Mar 20, 2026 +22
Well...John Mahoney passed away in 2018. There's absolutely no way anybody would expect him to be in the reboot. He was old when it originally aired on the 90s.
22
actuallyjoebiden Mar 20, 2026 +15
John Mahoney was only in his early 50’s when Frasier started.
15
Educational_Sky_1136 Mar 20, 2026 +11
It's crazy that he was only 15 years older than Kelsey Grammer. Mahoney was 53 when the show premiered.
11
Werthead Mar 20, 2026 +3
He was in his mid-50s, he was only 15 years older than Kelsey Grammer.
3
davisyoung Mar 20, 2026 +3
This would be like Scrubs without Turk and Dr. Cox. 
3
spongebobisha Mar 20, 2026 +37
This. Close thread. It’s like JD not having Turk.
37
Lotan Mar 20, 2026 +10
"New Girl reboot, but it's only Jess"
10
poopBuccaneer Mar 20, 2026 +7
It felt like Kelsey Grammar Ego Show without the rest of the cast.
7
spaceporter Mar 20, 2026 +150
Scrubs is a funny, zany but surprisingly emotionally deep sitcom. New Scrubs is a funny, zany but surprisingly emotionally deep sitcom. Frasier is a chaotic, zany but surprisingly erudite sitcom. New Frasier is a very basically stuctured sitcom.
150
Jeff-IT Mar 20, 2026 +51
Honestly it just feels like it picked up where it left off. All the old characters feel the same. New characters breath some nice new life in it. Only complaint I have is I want more Cox and Dr. Jan Itor
51
Difficult_Mix_3620 Mar 20, 2026 +61
Frasier needs a sidekick and Freddie wasn’t it. Trying to turn Freddie into Martin just felt disingenuous. Frasier being in Boston and never once stepping foot into Cheers also felt like the character had forgotten his roots.
61
AmbulanceChaser12 Mar 20, 2026 +22
Yes, what was up with that whole new bar they had? OK, fine, whatever, it's not Old Frasier, and it's not Old Cheers. But maybe they should have at least mentioned it. "Oh I couldn't go back. Sam and Woody don't work the bar anymore, and Cliff and Norm don't hang out there. Why would I?"
22
tfurrows Mar 20, 2026 +20
That's all they needed to say. "Cheers was never a place, it was the people. I dropped by once and the people I knew weren't there anymore. Nobody knew my name. It wasn't just that the place didn't feel the same, it felt like it wasn't \*there\* anymore. It made me sad. I've never been back."
20
AmbulanceChaser12 Mar 20, 2026 +14
>Nobody knew my name. And for Cheers, that would be the greatest sadness of all.
14
jaylyerly Mar 20, 2026 +18
Such a bizarre creative choice to move the show to Boston and ignore the whole other show set in Boston. I’m guessing they thought it’d be cool but then all of the Cheers cast noped out.
18
flergnabbit Mar 20, 2026 +4
Yeah they got Freddy wrong. The actor kept trying to do his best Chandler Bing or something. Mainly, though, the writing wasn’t there. In old Frasier, jokes might sneak up on you but in the new, everything was obvious and dumb. And there were no heartfelt moments. They did attempt to show new Frasier as someone who forgot who he was, and that could’ve been interesting with more nuanced writing. Seattle Frasier, for all his bumbling, could still help people, and in turn help himself or his family. But the new version was like a stranger. I wanted to like it, but it never worked.
4
DTBlayde Mar 20, 2026 +23
It feels incredibly familiar with the "old" seasons, while making enough changes where it feels current. Definitely feels like they really understood what the lifeblood of the show was, didn't mess with that, but also made sure to not just give us the original show regurgitated. JD, Turk and co all feel the same as we left them, but they've also grown and changed over the years. Obviously it's not a perfect show, and I doubt it's an award w*****, but it's an entertaining comfort show and that has value to me
23
Asta1977 Mar 20, 2026 +9
"JD, Turk and co all feel the same as we left them, but they've also grown and changed over the years." THIS. From what I saw of the Frasier reboot, Frasier hadn't changed at all. The man had a terrible, somewhat estranged relationship with his son, but he did that he always did and expected Freddie to bend to his needs and have the kind of relationship he wanted. And after all the years bashing Lilith, when she shows up, we see she was the good parent who understands and accepts her son. Such strange writing.
9
saintash Mar 20, 2026 +2
I'm also gonna be honest. I don't understand how you could have written a show with Freddie Frasier 'S kid and given him Son, who's nothing like the kid He was in frasier, the tv show. One of the best episodes in the whole series is the one where Martin tries to treat him like a normal kid and ends up with two black eyes. And though horrified look he gives people where they're like, go play with your grandpa because of all the shenanigans going on in the episode. To have that kid be a down to earth, fireman years later, just seemed so out of left field.
2
Asta1977 Mar 20, 2026 +2
Yeah. I could see Freddie not becoming like his parents, but somebody thought they needed a character like Martin, so they wrote him like Martin. Young Freddie had an interest in computers and video games. Have him in tech - app or game developer. Frasier could still be befuddled and butt heads with him.
2
NBCaz Mar 20, 2026 +38
Frasier reboot on any number of levels, cast, writing, story lines, production, it felt just c**** and like a money grab.
38
g_smiley Mar 20, 2026 +15
Kelsey grammer turned out to be a maga piece of shit. So f*** him
15
UsedToiletWater Mar 20, 2026 +13
New Frasier should've never happened when they couldn't get Niles back. He was a huge part of the original show. Instead they got that professor guy to be the "new Niles" and it sucked. With Scrubs they at least got the original 3 interns back. It's too bad that Dr. Cox has a very small part because him calling JD a different girl's name every episode while JD desperately wanting his approval was one of my favorite things about the original show. It's also too bad that Carla isn't on a lot because I'm in love with her.
13
XJDenton Mar 20, 2026 +3
Honestly speaking, I'm glad that they actually restricted how much the old cast (outside the core trio) have featured. It's given the new cast room to breathe and develop without being swamped by nostalgia. I think that's how Scrubs has worked so well: they've used the core cast to serve as a good foundation to develop a bunch of new characters who are simultaneously familiar in feel but also distinctly different and interesting in their own way.
3
p_a_schal Mar 20, 2026 +11
I’m enjoying Scrubs, but I find it to be missing interpersonal drama within the main cast that the original had. The Janitor is greatly missed and a greater presence of Cox was needed. I will say that Sibby is great and Dashana is enjoyable but the other new additions aren’t doing anything for me yet. It’s good, but it’s no Twin Peaks season 3.
11
Cornualonga Mar 20, 2026 +11
Bill Lawerence
11
Luppercus Mar 20, 2026 +9
Man Frasier was basically a revival In Name Only. Apart from name recognition I don't get why they didn't just made it a new show about a celebrity psychologist going back to Academia trying to reconnect to his firefighter son. But yeah basically they made a new show with little to to none connection to the original. That's like making a Seinfeld revival only with Jerry or Married with Children only with Al. But I better don't give any ideas.
9
Rags2Riches420 Mar 20, 2026 +8
No Kelsey Grammar.
8
Dobvius Mar 20, 2026 +7
Bill Lawrence
7
punarob Mar 20, 2026 +8
No Nazis as leads
8
Toxicity246 Mar 20, 2026 +7
I watched all of the Fraiser reboot, and it simply lacked the charm or intelligence of the NBC series. It felt like just another sitcom.
7
decidedlyindecisive Mar 21, 2026 +2
That's the big thing missing for me. The original Fraiser was genuinely clever. The reboot felt very stupid, like watching The Big Bang Theory. TBBT is fine, but it's a very different style of comedy.
2
kaest Mar 20, 2026 +6
I mean, the Fraiser reboot was missing 90% of the original cast. The new characters aren't endearing at all. Scrubs came back with everyone. And feels exactly the same but older.
6
SurfCrazy Mar 20, 2026 +6
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I didn't hate the new Frasier. It was definitely lacking Niles though.
6
chemchris Mar 20, 2026 +5
Let's not d******* producer and showrunner Bill Lawrence, he's kind of had a midas touch if you like his style. Ted Lasso, shrinking, the original scrubs, spin city
5
Psych0matt Mar 20, 2026 +2
I didn’t realize shrinking was bill Lawrence, the wife and I just started it, I really like it so far (4 or 5 episodes in)
2
badbadprettaygood Mar 20, 2026 +4
Tone! It feels like a direct natural follow from 2009. Same style of humour. Same filming style. Brought all the key actors back with their perfect chemistry. New characters are actually funny. Adding in new tech/cultural changes without feeling like a 100 year old man clumsily tacked them onto the script (looking at And Just Like That)
4
jroberts548 Mar 20, 2026 +4
Imagine if Scrubs had not also brought back Chalke and Faison or Sacred Heart. Also Bill Lawrence is one of the writers. Frasier brought Burrows back to direct but not the same writers. Also, one great thing scrubs does is that if you were in the right age to love it during the initial run, you were early in your career or about to start your career, and now you’re many years into your career. JD, Elliott, and Turk have aged with the audience. The frasier reboot (which I had no interest in watching) was promoted as Frederick being a main character. (This is probably also why the Scrubs spin-off, also called Scrubs, failed. They tried going back to a first year student instead of maturing with the audience.)
4
dragon_6666 Mar 20, 2026 +4
What I personally love about the new Scrubs - besides the fact that it retains its original charm - is that it doesn’t beat you over the head with remember whens. Too often reboots will rely too heavily on the past. We were there. Yes, we remember when. The new Scrubs perfectly balances familiarity with freshness.
4
j-whiskey Mar 20, 2026 +4
Kelsey Grammer.
4
Sonichu- Mar 20, 2026 +14
I haven't seen the Scrubs revival yet, but if I had to guess it's because they brought back more than one character. "Frasier" is more than just *Frasier*'s show. Ask anyone and you're just as likely to hear that someone's favorite character is Niles, Martin, Roz, etc. Scrubs would have failed if they only brought back JD. Frasier might have succeeded if they brought back Daphne and Niles.
14
Booster_Tutor Mar 20, 2026 +12
Exactly. It’s like doing a Seinfeld reboot and only bringing back Jerry. Nobody wants that.
12
Typical_Stormtrooper Mar 20, 2026 +3
There's an irony I always point out when discussing Frasier: the title character is my least favorite on the show. As you mentioned, the supporting cast was truly the backbone of the original series.
3
saintash Mar 20, 2026 +3
They brought back the jd turk and Eliot , Carla has show up a few times but she isn't seam like main cast more like she might be popping up here and there for an episode.The way jordan used to. The Todd has made a few cameos too.
3
Sinja_Minx Mar 20, 2026 +7
Apples to Oranges
7
zoobrix Mar 20, 2026 +3
Just a failure to recreate the elements that people liked from the original Frasier. I couldn't make it past the first episode, felt way too cookie cutter sitcom. Some of the key production staff from the original Frasier run came back but the writing did not hit the same notes like Scrubs has managed to. It's obvious Bill Lawrence knew how to make that happen. Obviously losing Martin was tragic but not having Niles was a huge blow as well that I don't think it could really get past. We might be missing Ted, Kelso and have limited Cox and Janitor but would the Scrubs revival work without Turk? I'd argue losing Elliot would be fatal too.
3
Asta1977 Mar 20, 2026 +3
It felt like Bill Lawrence had been thinking about a continuation for a long time and that it was a group effort with lots of discussion how to do it right. It's not like Bill needed another TV show. But Frasier was Kelsey doing a hard sell and desperately resurrecting the character to get a big payday and stay relevant.
3
WySLatestWit Mar 20, 2026 +3
New Scrubs has more elements of old scrubs than new Frasier had of the original Frasier. Cast, setting, producers, etc., have returned for Scrubs. With Frasier the only recognizable element was Kelsey Grammer playing a character named Frasier that had very little in common with the character as we knew them.
3
dubyadubya Mar 20, 2026 +3
Everyone has mentioned Niles and the old cast and that's basically it. New Frasier straddled this weird line of sort of passing the torch by mostly focusing on Frasier and Freddie (plus the other new characters, who were hit and miss). The issue to me is that Freddie was just a dud--I still swear that if they'd cast Freddie better the show might have had a shot, but new Freddie was a charisma void. Frasier himself is still almost enough to carry it--as much as Grammer sucks, he's still great at what he does--but it just didn't connect. I didn't hate it honestly, but I don't exactly miss it. Scrubs is also straddling that line but with more older characters to help balance it. And while the new characters are still finding their footing, they've got some potential. Mostly though, new Scrubs is just better written, generally as good as the original. New Frasier was ok, but nothing compared to how well-written the original was.
3
cjati Mar 20, 2026 +3
Scrubs is basically the same show. The formula really hasn't changed much from the original run.
3
Digitalon Mar 20, 2026 +10
This really is the case. I've only watched the first 3 episodes but it totally feels like slipping on a pair of old shoes, it fits just like it always has. Besides Dr. Cox seemingly dipping out completely after the first episode, pretty much everything is the same.
10
Andybabez20 Mar 20, 2026 +6
I was disappointed with that initially as Dr Cox was the best character in the original series. But now that i've seen a few episodes of JD as Chief of Medicine it was definitely the correct decision in terms of storytelling opportunities.
6
Abeds_BananaStand Mar 20, 2026 +5
The actor had a scheduling type issue is I believe why he’s going to be an occasional guest star. Same with Carla’s actor
5
wheresjah87 Mar 20, 2026 +3
Not only were Jane Leeves and David Hyde Pierce not back, but the replacements just didn’t hit the mark. So far the new additions to Scrubs have worked really well 
3
Rocky75617794 Mar 20, 2026 +3
Somewhat likable people
3
davegammelgard Mar 20, 2026 +3
The character of Frasier started out as a caricature and only got bigger. There was nowhere else to go with the character. He needed the others in the ensemble to have any forward movement. Scrubs was often over the top, but somehow kept the characters grounded, so they can have their big moments and then return to their characters. Also,the hospital premise is infinitely refillable, whereas Frasier is more focused on their home life. It's not nearly as interesting.
3
Sensitive-Cover-5687 Mar 20, 2026 +3
JD is a doctor at Sacred Heart with his old friends. Meanwhile, Fraisier works in Boston and not only do we never see old characters outside of Roz and Bebe, but we don't see any of his old friends from Cheers, either.
3
stonewallace17 Mar 20, 2026 +3
Scrubs just feels like the same show that took a 15 year break. It's not identical which is fine because with 15 years passing in real life and in the show it would be weird if it was, but all the core elements are there. JD and Turk's bromance, JD's narration and daydreams, the humor, the serious moments sprinkled in, Hooch is still crazy...
3
Danominator Mar 20, 2026 +3
Niles is tue best part of frasier
3
AnalogWalrus Mar 20, 2026 +3
well, for one Scrubs doesn’t star a MAGA simp, so it has that going for it. 😂
3
DaBiGGPoPPa Mar 20, 2026 +3
I mean other than the lack of the shitty human that is Kelsey Grammar?
3
Bayou_Mama Mar 21, 2026 +3
This doesn’t really answer your question because this is just how the shows were set up, but I wanted so badly to watch the new Frasier, but could not stand the laugh track or audience laughter. It just bugs the heck out of me now. I was more patient with it during the original shows but now I know we don’t have to live like that!
3
SouthlandMax Mar 21, 2026 +3
The Frasier reboot had no setting. The show was either a father son odd couple living together or a weird will they, won't they roommate with a baby dynamic. Or it was a university professor in an office, or it was firefighters in a bar that wasn't cheers. It was too much of everything spread everywhere. The show didn't even acknowledge any of its history. They had Freddy who was firmly established as Jewish ever since Cheers celebrating Christmas. Plus they made him lie constantly for no good reason. It was great seeing Frasier again but he was just wandering around in scenes with nothing to do.
3
Zorlal Mar 20, 2026 +10
You are going to get some good answers from this, but I would also like to offer that I simply refuse to watch anything with Kelsey Grammar in it since he is a total simp for Trump. Can't even look at Sideshow Bob the same anymore
10
phoenix0r Mar 20, 2026 +5
I actually liked the Frasier reboot and watched all the episodes. Missing Niles, Daphne and the Dad definitely made it feel very different and more like a pure Kelsey Grammar show. But I thought the writing and silly comedy bits were still good enough for a laugh and I was genuinely surprised when it was cancelled. The new Scrubs feels a LOT more like the old Scrubs. To the point where I forget that it isn’t the old Scrubs until I see how old JD and Eliot are. I think it’s really just because Scrubs has the full main cast and Frasier didn’t. Also I’m just guessing here but the new Scrubs could be slightly more appealing to GenZ, given the younger new characters.
5
elmerjstud Mar 20, 2026 +5
When I saw frasier I thought about brandan Fraser's character on scrubs....now if they can someone revive him or retcon in scrubs...that would be incredible
5
Juunlar Mar 20, 2026 +27
Kelsey Grammar sucks as a human, and i won't watch it.  Also no Niles?
27
esteemph Mar 20, 2026 +5
My wife and i liked the new frasier a lot
5
EataDisk Mar 20, 2026 +4
Honestly I'm not sure, I actually like a lot of things about the Frasier reboot. Yes missing Niles was rough, but except for that first episode we're without Dr. Cox too, so it can't just be that. Will see if Scrubs quality goes down quickly or if the writers can keep up the quality without fixating on post-divorce storyline too heavily.
4
OdoWanKenobi Mar 20, 2026 +5
A difference between Scrubs and Frasier is that JD, Turk, and Elliot are likeable characters who can carry the show even without Cox, Carla, or the Janitor. Frasier is an absolute insufferable human being who needed Niles and Martin to play against, or we would not have been able to stand him. They were a much more vital part of the show than the secondary characters from Scrubs.
5
hillean Mar 20, 2026 +5
the Frasier watchers were my parents and grandparents--who are pretty old now and don't care about that kind of stuff. They were catering to a generation who is mostly gone or too old to follow up on new shows. Scrubs is definitely catering to a younger audience (and when I say young I mean 'not retired yet')
5
DMM4140 Mar 20, 2026 +5
Its the same show
5
steak4take Mar 20, 2026 +4
For one thing, Scrubs doesn’t have an abhorrent trumper as its lead.
4
J_Lumen Mar 20, 2026 +2
More original characters and nostalgia
2
Comfortfoods Mar 20, 2026 +2
Scrubs really captured the essence of the show and moved it forward in time. The Frasier reboot felt so disconnected from the og show that it was just bizarre. It felt like a completely different show that it probably would have been better to not call it Frasier at all. They could have just given Kelsey's character a new name and ran with that.
2
booboo773 Mar 20, 2026 +2
Despite the show title Frazier wasn’t the reason people watched. Niles, Martin, and Daphne made the show what it was.
2
Cowgirl_Taint Mar 20, 2026 +2
For one thing? They diidn't make a spinoff starring the least interesting character on the show. Frasier was ALWAYS the worst part of Frasier and mostly his value was in being able to riff off of Niles and Martin and Daphne and Roz. I also think starting (?) with a "mystery" of whether Freddie was The Father set the tone in a really strange way. Same with having that weird storyline where Frasier and Freddie were maybe dating the same woman? Contrast that with Scrubs where it is still an ensemble cast and they have, mostly, done a really good job of balancing call backs with the kind of stories these characters would have 20 years later. ---- Also, Freddie was a complete contradiction to the child Freddie. Obviously people change, but he was the geekiest and most frail kid at opera camp (?) and got made fun of for needing to wear a full sun suit. Whereas Niles and Daphne's firstborn already was established to have Moon Genes. Which would line up better with becoming a rough and tumble firefighter. And Uncle Frasier trying to be "the cool Crane" to his nephew is a very Fraser Storyline.
2
eggflip1020 Mar 20, 2026 +2
They brought back the characters that people loved. Frazier did not. One thing I will say, is that I do bump into the look of the new Scrubs. The old show was shot on NTSC and then 16MM a little bit with some HD video later in the series and even that sucked. But the relaunch is 1000% shot digitally on HD video and I really don’t like it at all. It just looks like shit. But still the new show is really good.
2
NotYourAvgJoey Mar 20, 2026 +2
I like it so far but needs more Cox!
2
Digitalon Mar 20, 2026 +2
I can't speak to Fraiser, I never watched it. But I've long considered Scrubs one of the best sitcom's ever made(besides season 9, no one is perfect). New Scrubs feels like it picks up after a time jump after a season break, sure it's different because of some missing characters and the addition of some new ones but the chemistry of the core cast is more than enough to make it feel like the old show. It's almost as if the show never stopped, honestly it feels like it sets the bar for the right way to do a revival of an old show, it feels like home in all the ways that matters while still being flexible enough to add new dynamics/characters.
2
ActuallyItsSumnus Mar 20, 2026 +2
This definitely isn't the only factor certainly, but I heard Zach Braff mention it in an interview, and it makes a lot of sense. A lot of the people involved in the new scrubs were involved (even if super loosely guesting on an episode) in the rewatch podcast. They spent the last handful of years hearing all about what was loved most about the original. From fans and from each other. That reenforced what to do and what not to do in the new season. They went back to what sort of felt like the early days of scrubs a bit. It is good. New cast will just need to mesh and learn to work together.
2
Tetsusaiga1370 Mar 20, 2026 +2
Actual advertisement. Frazier being a Paramount Plus exclusive (minus a few episodes in the first season to promote) just didn't attract enough people. Also some of the other things being said here (characters, "feeling", etc)
2
fakeaccount572 Mar 20, 2026 +2
the new Frasier needed Niles, that's all. Imagine Scrubs without JD.
2
Imperfect_Dark Mar 20, 2026 +2
It still wants to tell new stories with these characters. The Scrubs return isn't perfect (it needs a bit more impact IMO) but it's trying to tell something new while also staying close to the familiar. It's not purely doing the old or purely doing the new.
2
Ok-Education7000 Mar 20, 2026 +2
I can't speak to Frasier, but Scrubs feels incredibly like we just picked up where we left off. The storylines make sense and are believable from what we already knew of the characters. They told us immediately via Dr Cox and Sibby that the outdated jokes weren't going to be there anymore, but somehow they've totally kept the same humor we fell in love with.
2
huntforhire Mar 20, 2026 +2
No one wanted new Frazier and it didn’t have most of the cast.
2
UglySofaGaming Mar 21, 2026 +2
The script isn't horrific
2
zeroxray Mar 21, 2026 +2
Frasier without niles just doesn't work. Without Martin even worse. They tried bringing Ros back in season 2 but it wasn't enough. The show was just meh
2
mopeywhiteguy Mar 21, 2026 +2
The side characters in the new Frasier were boring and bland. The performances were not on the same level as the original. David Hyde pierce was giving Broadway level theatrical performances as Nile’s but the new cast was giving big bang theory levels. The original Frasier is different enough from cheers that it stood on its own and became its own thing. The revivial of Frasier was a watered down version too similar to the original. Also I think modern day writers have forgotten how to write sitcoms
2
DarkArmyLieutenant Mar 21, 2026 +2
Kelsey Grammar is a shitstain of a person?
2
Oolican Mar 21, 2026 +2
Fraser seemed totally out of touch and dated. The story arc of the first season was that as I recall Fraser thought his son was gay as if that even matters anymore. And then he buys the building. So he's wealthy and just not anyone people would have an interest in imho. And a laugh trak.
2
1975hh3 Mar 21, 2026 +2
Can’t compare apples to shit
2
ImYeez Mar 21, 2026 +2
A better cast.
2
elkoubi Mar 21, 2026 +2
I don't have anything real to contribute. I just want to say I'm enjoying the heck out of it, and what truly sold it to me was last week's episode. There's a scene between JD and Elliot discussing the way that Dr. Cox was verbally abusive to Elliot. It's still obvious there was love there, but also trauma. It felt very real to me as a Xenial dealing with my own issues with the generation that came before us.
2
MidwestTroy92 Mar 21, 2026 +2
scrubs always had that thing where it could be hilarious and then punch you in the gut 10 minutes later. frasier reboot just felt like it was trying to remind you it used to be good
2
Bananaman9020 Mar 21, 2026 +2
More than just one of the main actors to return? Better writing? I haven't seen either of the sequel reboots.
2
DarkS7Maneuver Mar 21, 2026 +2
Plot
2
← Back to Board