Some of the reasons I can think of: meh finales in both seasons 3 and 4 that kind of undermined everything that happened during the seasons themselves. An insane amount of sexual humor starting in season 3 that at times felt overwhelming. A lack of realism perhaps in the show that came on gradually, primarily with character choices. Homelander getting dumbed down to the point where he’s basically just an aggressive gorilla hellbent on power (I thought he was a lot more interesting when he was depicted as somewhat shrewd in season 1). What do yall think about the direction the show went in following the first couple seasons?
I’m not looking to ruffle any feathers but I’ll give you my two cents.
The only big bad is Homelander. You can only spin the same villain season after season so many times before the bit gets old imo. My fix would’ve been to add another element at the start of the show to make Homelander more “bendable”. Like if he had to team up with the boys for a season because of a bigger threat. Maybe every country has a Homelander. Maybe a meteor landed and there’s a bug or alien that’s strong or replicating. Etc. Another layer would’ve definitely added some more fun.
I understand why people like it. Because it’s a fun show. Great characters. But I can also see why you’d make this post. And I can look at it from your perspective too. And you’re not wrong lol.
8
IaintyourbabysitterApr 14, 2026
+33
I liked it 🤷♂️
33
[deleted]Apr 14, 2026
-3
[deleted]
-3
nicklovin508Apr 14, 2026
-1
Oh damn then your opinion isn’t needed?
-1
Spaceballs_the_tagApr 14, 2026
+4
I’ve still been enjoying it. A few moments in season 4 lost me a little cause it went beyond madcap sexual humor into some kinda gross mean spirited stuff, but generally still a solid season. It also dragged a little as it slowed things down to fit the five seasons, so if you don’t have a lot of patience, it can seem slow.
It’s the curse of being a big show. It’s gonna lose some of its subtlety in its commentary, it’s gonna lose some fans as things change and elevate. It has pretty simple gimmick, but I think it does enough to keep things interesting and parody new elements of the culture.
4
kirby2000Apr 15, 2026
+6
It became the thing it was parodying. There was no need for multiple spin offs and they never had a plan with the story.
Although the comic has it's haters, it had places to go. Making Homelander the main antagonist on the show really backed them into a corner despite the excellent performance in the first 2 seasons. The comics had a whole world of superheroes and The Boys acting as a police force to keep them in line, not a group of rebels fighting for good.
6
killedbygavrilo2Apr 15, 2026
+3
The third season finale was wasted potential. I loved season 3 and then it just went back to the status quo at the beginning of the Season. Season 4 set up new characters in the 7, some less interesting than others. The obvious Butcher twist was weak. Frenchie had a weird subplot, but the finale was good and set this season which will be how most people will end up judging it.
3
Complex210Apr 14, 2026
+13
According to RT: Season 1 85%, S2 97%, S3 98%, S4 92%, S5 96% so far.
13
greenufo333Apr 14, 2026
+9
Eh idk, I just watched all of it for the first time and definitely noticed the writing in later seasons isn't amazing
9
Circle_BreakerApr 14, 2026
-7
Self selective audience.
People who don't like it and would give negative ratings drop the series.
-7
Locke108Apr 14, 2026
+3
But those are critic scores and critics can’t drop a show because they don’t like it.
3
Circle_BreakerApr 14, 2026
The critics score the current season is 85 not 96
0
fire_and_spice24Apr 14, 2026
+1
It's currently[ 96%](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_boys_2019/s05) on their critics fresh/positive rating system.
1
Circle_BreakerApr 14, 2026
+2
I don't read good
2
Locke108Apr 14, 2026
+1
No, the critics score for the 1st season is 85, the new one is 96
1
Complex210Apr 14, 2026
+5
What?
5
followmarkoApr 14, 2026
-5
just pat them on the head and move on
-5
Complex210Apr 14, 2026
But I'm bored at work.
0
Circle_BreakerApr 14, 2026
-6
PEOPLE WHO LIKE SHOW KEEP WATCHING
PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE SHOW STOP WATCHING
RATINGS FOR LATER SEASONS GENERALLY GET BOOST BECAUSE PEOPLE WHO GAVE LOW RATINGS IN EARLY SEASON STOPPED WATCHING.
-6
Complex210Apr 14, 2026
+2
Oh, thanks for explaining, but also ratings for later seasons are getting review bombed for political reasons, and thats probably a far bigger influence.
2
fire_and_spice24Apr 14, 2026
+2
This isn't really true because those scores are from critics, not casual fans.
2
Circle_BreakerApr 14, 2026
Those are not the critics scores. The critics score for s5 is at 85
0
fire_and_spice24Apr 14, 2026
+1
They are. RT has two scores. Their "tomatoemeter" which is only critics and based on positive reviews. They also have "popcornmeter" which is based on 3.5 or higher ratings from users.
I'm curious where you are getting the 85 from because the critics percentage is currently at 96%. Edit: It looks like you are looking at season 1, not season 5.
1
Podria_Ser_PeorApr 14, 2026
+9
\*grabs popcorn\*
9
godver3Apr 14, 2026
+7
Right? Quite a biased post title you've got there OP - surely will lead to productive discussion... I'll just chime in to say I've enjoyed it the whole way through.
7
confusing_roundaboutApr 15, 2026
+3
Season 1 had a heavy plot focus. Season 2 had a good arc with Stormfront.
Season 3-4 were too decompressed and not as memorable. Soldier Boy or whatever the s4 plot was (genuinely cannot remember) weren't as engaging.
Season 1 is easily the best. You really feel Hughie's anger. The show lost that emotion as it went on.
3
101_210Apr 14, 2026
+7
IMO, because it went 5 seasons.
A lot of what made season 1 was the tension. The boys had no way to stand up to the seven, never mind Homelander. Anyone could die as far as we knew, and the show DID kill big players (Stillwell).
The big scenes had this tension of not knowing who lived. You kinda guessed Huguie and Butcher were safe, but characters like Frenchie or MM were definitely not.
Then in season 2 we got increasingly dangerous situations… and everybody got out. Then again, and again, and again, except vilains or redeemned vilains.
Show tried to up the stakes with shock value, but it’s no match for tension.
This is also why the newest season is so well liked so far. By being a known last season, the tension is back. Kinda. They still have to show they will kill more than a redeemed villain at best imo.
7
longjohnsusApr 14, 2026
+1
Reminds me of stranger things in that sense. Another example of there being too many seasons without enough story to fill it
1
Gwenog_JonesApr 14, 2026
+6
By the last season (before this one), it felt like watching something 7th grade boys put together. Gross out sexual humor just to have it and with no purpose. Characters that felt like wasted potential or odd storylines. Repetitive character beats.
I really liked it in the beginning and now I won't be watching the final season because it feels like a waste of time and energy.
6
followmarkoApr 14, 2026
+1
This season feels the same as every other season. A Train ran through a person in the first ten minutes of the series and The Deep was instantly portrayed as a sex deviant. Imo gross/gore humor is part of its threading
1
Gwenog_JonesApr 14, 2026
+2
To me, they leaned into it more over time until I felt it was just silly. But ymmv.
2
longjohnsusApr 14, 2026
+1
Man that comparison to 7th grade boy thinking is brutal but accurate. The sheer amount of shock jock gore, swearing and sex came out of nowhere. Almost makes me think different writers came in
1
nicklovin508Apr 14, 2026
+6
It absolutely didn’t lol, revisionist history. Up until the finale season 3 of The Boys was absolutely the peak of the show hitting new highs every week. Then we got Gen V S1 which was also highly praised.
I do agree that season 4 was weaker, and Gen V S2 while good just was too predictable, but the show has at least stayed solid/interesting. And the first two episodes of the final season were very good imo.
6
JackorJohn62392Apr 14, 2026
+6
The season three finale is where they lost me. They finally have the chance to kill Homelander, but Butcher decides that Solider Boy is more dangerous.
I know it’s a show about superheroes, but it also felt ridiculous that Maeve is able to just go back to Iowa after faking death. She was probably the most famous woman in the world and no one is posting photos of her online?
6
Mookies_BettApr 16, 2026
+2
Also every other character is made to feel guilty whenever they decide that risking everything to stop Homelander isn't worth it, but you have Maeve out there just hanging out doing nothing in Iowa for the entire events of seasons 3-5 (so far) because "she's already been through enough." Like, what?
Butcher is literally killing himself to stop the most evil person on the planet and everyone else is basically risking suicide by Homelander to save the world, but no one seems to mind that one of the most powerful potential allies they could have has just decided to dip out and watch Homelander start up the concentration camps. The show constantly contradicts itself on what it's moral stances are supposed to be.
2
RafacusApr 14, 2026
+2
I still like it a whole lot. Annie too. \*shrug\*
2
chrispy145Apr 14, 2026
+2
Show has felt constant through the whole run. Not sure what you're talking about.
2
ayaj_viralApr 14, 2026
+3
Homelander going from calculating and unhinged to just a screaming manchild was the biggest loss honestly. They flanderized him hard and it dragged the whole show down with it.
3
TyposIncomingApr 14, 2026
+14
I think him lossing his grip and being more unhinged is one of the better decisions they made on the show
14
GaryTheCabalGuyApr 14, 2026
+6
It's the entire point of his character
6
Ragnar_DragonfyreApr 14, 2026
+2
He got everything he thought wanted and it didn’t make him happy.
He wants to be loved but he’s in a position where people fear him or laugh at him.
He’s a super powered test tube nepo baby who no longer has hyper competent people to look after and clean up after him because he eliminated them or dominated them into terrified subservience.
He only appeared calculating because Vought made sure all his many mistakes went away and he would never be held accountable.
2
dej0taApr 14, 2026
+2
I felt like the whole milk thing and murdering his mom was spelled out quite clearly. How else was he supposed to react? Like maybe youre right and that change made the show less than it was before but Homelander not going off the rails after wouldve made a worse show I think.
2
plutonasaApr 14, 2026
+2
when the strongest man who had everything starts to lose everything and then not get everything he wants, surely he would start to go insane over every thing that goes slightly off the track no matter how minute the detail.
2
longjohnsusApr 14, 2026
+1
Very true. I think the juxtaposition of calculating and unhinged was more intersting than him gritting his teeth everytime he gets upset and pointing at someone 😂. Still a great character but man, could’ve been even better
1
oldmanjenkins51Apr 14, 2026
+2
I’m going to be honest, I never thought it was that great to begin with. It was fun and the political commentary was great. That being said it always reminded me of rated R CW tv.
2
Goofballs2Apr 14, 2026
+1
Victim of its own success. Season 1 had lots of gross out isn't that shocking content. I wouldn't say it was a grounded show at the start but it tooks its coherence a lot more seriously. They tried for a certain amount of plausible which made the villains threatening and the heroes threatened.
What the writers learned was, people really like really graphic scenes. And they stopped earning them. For example the start of season 1 Hughie and the girlfriend have this entire prelude conversation about their future and love for each other and A Train turns here into paste out of nowhere. Horrifying, but so shocking it came around the other direction into funny. It was like a sped up version of the bit in Wolf of Wall Street where Leo is trying to crawl to his car. It goes from desparate to hilarious. Then you fast forward to season 3 start, some exposition I can't even remember oh and antman is on coke and he's in a guy's d***. Gross but just boring unless that unlocked something inside of you.
Its like they tried to learn from the algorithim about why the show was popular. People like swearing and making references in dialogue! Kimiko can talk now, she's unfiltered and nothing about her ever remotely suggested she would have an internal monologue like that.
That's okay, I'll still keep drinking that garbage. I still watched it.
1
longjohnsusApr 14, 2026
+2
That’s an interesting take on it. Based on what you’re saying it seems like it fell into the pitfall of every show that falls off over time: It starts catering to what the fans might want instead of telling a meaningful story. Which is what he start to get in season 3.
I’m not even sure most of the fans are that into the gratuitous violence, swearing and sex. It wasn’t like that at all to begin with. They just decided that’s what the shows gonna become.
2
Goofballs2Apr 14, 2026
+1
No idea, it could be the men in grey suits pushing what they think the audience wants. It could be they just used up all the juice too early. You would have to work on it to really know.
There was loads and loads of sex and violence in season 1.
1
strider85Apr 14, 2026
+2
It didn’t. People on here just love to moan about it constantly for some unknown reason
It’s always been one of the most entertaining shows on tv with the quality being consistent for the most part
2
deadnsideApr 14, 2026
+2
The more they made the nazis the bad guys, the more I enjoyed it.
2
dej0taApr 14, 2026
+2
Omfg every show that last longer than 3 seasons has to deal with this shit...yall can stop watching and unsub. You know that right?
2
DeLarge93Apr 14, 2026
+1
Season 3 was the best season
1
ImLaunchpadMcQuackApr 14, 2026
+3
Probably like every genre based show they have a bunch of whiny ass fanboys who act like they always know better than the writers and producers. Then the same people attack everyone involved in the production until the show is canceled or nobody enjoys any aspect of it anymore.
3
DaKingaDaNorthApr 14, 2026
+3
It didn't
3
Reasonable-Turn-5940Apr 14, 2026
+1
I liked season 3. I'm not on this bandwagon personally
1
boomosaurApr 15, 2026
+1
It didn't...
1
joecal952Apr 14, 2026
+1
It went from being somewhat more neutrally cynical in how its politics are presented to overtly partisan and preachy.
1
Bebop_ManApr 14, 2026
Because they had to live up to their reputation for shocking violence/gross out moments and constantly one-upping themselves while also preserving status quo for way longer than the story would reasonably allow.
And f*** Trump but Homelander as a Trump metaphor got old fast. Reality became stranger than fiction around the time they decided to parody it.
0
sugarwax1Apr 14, 2026
+1
I think the show went too far for most of us, and they leaned into courting a trench coat mafia audience.
1
EmekaEgbukaPukaNacuaApr 15, 2026
+1
Starlight and homelander made it.
Then starlight went all Botox and lip filler, which didn’t really fit the character at the time. Normally it would not matter, but the whole idea of starlight was being the innocent, naive southern girl… and the casting fit was just so perfect. Then it sort of went on its head, and the show rather than adapting and immediately making the story “starlight went plastic and fake”, to explain it(which would have been awesome)… they kept pretending nothing changed.
Homelander I think also was at his best when the writers kept it ambiguous as to whether you could like/agree with him. It’s sort of like norm Macdonald said… parity only works if you try to like or respect the person you are parodying … because most most people like themselves(which is why SNL parody often falls flat).
I think after too many people were using homelander memes in a non ironic way… the writers hand held the audience, and in a hamfisted way tried to make it clear you aren’t supposed to like him, and it became clear the writers hated him, making the parody less successful, or interesting, devolving into more of the same… thin partisan commentary.
The boys was awesome for its awesome characters, awesome casting, and how it was originally a counter culture type of show. Then it became a typical sell out show, becoming what it once parodied (shameless superhero money grabs). Starlight to me was just the icing on the cake… even the actors turned into the typical fake Hollywood shit that everyone hates with the over the top plastic surgery and lip fillers. It felt different. Now it just feels like another marvel flick with some cursing. It’s still decent. But it had a chance to be something special and that was lost somewhere along the way.
1
PatTheBugFixerApr 15, 2026
+2
So the actress who plays starlight has grimes disease so the plastic surgery was mostly covering for that. Also when was homelander ever someone you could ljme/agree with? Entertaining as hell character yes but he's always been a depraved sicko since day 1.
2
EmekaEgbukaPukaNacuaApr 15, 2026
Graves’ disease doesn’t make you pump your lips up with filler like balloons about to pop. Nor to get the buccal fat surgury that makes you look 30 years old and like a ghost. Nor to get so much Botox you can’t even move your face. Nor do they make you get b*** surgery.
As far as homelander… as I said the literal people in the show talked about how people were viewing him as a hero unironically. You may not have… but tons of people did… to the point people involved in the show have publicly spoken about it.
It’s like saying “I think cilantro is gross, nobody could possibly like it because I don’t and everyone must think about things exactly like I do”. Walter white, Tony soprano, dexter etc were evil as shit. But people had some degree of like for them, despite them being psychopathic murderers. It makes a show a lot more complex, and interesting when everything isn’t laid out in black and white like a children’s story.
Hell the actor who plays Walter white right now is all over this sub talking about how many people sided with walt, the mass murderer drug kingpin, over his wife who complained too much so people blamed her.
0
Shell_flyApr 14, 2026
-3
Kripke became obsessed with exclusively satirizing Trump and American politics instead of what seasons 1 and 2 did best.
-3
CallTheKhlul-hlooApr 14, 2026
+1
Lol. It was always going to be about abuse of power and rise of facism. Not Kripkes fault America is speed running it's decline faster than he can put out seasons.
1
Mookies_BettApr 16, 2026
+2
The issue isn't commentary. It's that the commentary is so ham fisted and obvious that it doesn't feel clever or creative at all. It's like "Babys first satire." Everything is so on the nose and obvious, it's like Kripe is screaming into a megaphone in your face "TRUMP AND NAZIS BAD" over and over again. It's not good writing or good television to bash your audience over the head with your message.
2
CallTheKhlul-hloo6 days ago
+1
The fact you're reading at "Trump and nazis bad" means you've missed a lot of the nuance of the characters. You're blinded by it being set in america so you're focused on that and how bad the writing is pointing out what's currently happened.
I'm saying there aren't things that are "bonk on your head" obvious. And there is some badly written parts. However, there's a lot more nuance in each of the character arcs. Their psychology of why they've made decisions and how it's changed them. That's hwere you should focus on. Understanding how facism works and the people around it. I think you're looking for a show to tell you it's nuanced before you looked at the nuanced aspects of it.
1
[deleted]Apr 14, 2026
-1
[removed]
-1
longjohnsusApr 14, 2026
+3
I’m here for a discussion my dude. Just stating an opinion
3
Gumbercules81Apr 14, 2026
-2
It should have played out more like invincible tbh
-2
Complex210Apr 14, 2026
-3
It didnt, it only got better. Season 4 had a slow start, but besides that theyre firing on all cylinders right now.
70 Comments