The biggest show on television at one point and 20 years later nobody really talks about it. Last night they asked the Trail-Blazers what their favorite shows were and you hear the usual; Breaking Bad, The Wire, Game of Thrones, even a show like Dexter still dominates conversation but Lost has been completely forgotten. Is it because there’s no rewatch value?
Lost still f****** slaps. All this mystery box style shows are a direct result of Lost with every show trying to find their own lore and mythology. Anytime a new mystery show drops, the first and immediate comparison is Lost. That’s like comparing a new drama to the Sopranos. That’s high praise. Lost wasn’t the best but 20 years later and it’s still the benchmark for those types of shows going forward
4
PablosCocaineHippo23 hr ago
+16
Because its more than 20 years old
16
Conscious-Quarter42323 hr ago
-6
Friends ended the same time as Lost and people rewatch and quote Friends all the time
-6
DothrakiSlayer23 hr ago
+9
Because it’s a sitcom…
9
Sonichu-20 hr ago
+3
Friends is a sitcom. It’s much easier to watch than Lost
3
kbange23 hr ago
+27
Of the shows you listed only The Wire is older than Lost. And all but The Wire have gotten spin offs and prequels since their original show ended. And I don’t really think The Wire dominates cultural conversation more than Lost, really. At least not outside online circles.
27
royaltrux23 hr ago
+2
Numerous universities, including Harvard, Duke, U.C. Berkeley, and Middlebury, offer college courses centered on HBO's *The Wire* to explore urban sociology, political science, inequality, and institutional failure. These classes often use all five seasons as a primary text to analyze the war on drugs, deindustrialization, and bureaucracy.
2
PlantOG23 hr ago
+2
Damn that sounds like a badass class.
2
kbange23 hr ago
+4
That makes sense. I like The Wire but I still think if I polled 100 random people on the street more people would know Lost offhand. So it depends on how you define cultural impact. More college courses teach Ulysses, but more people know Harry Potter, you know?
4
confusing_roundabout23 hr ago
+1
I don't know, you underestimate how much people talked about The Wire during Breaking Bad's run. "The best show since The Wire" was used all the time. And now when I think of prestige TV, the first 2 that come to mind are Breaking Bad and The Wire.
1
kbange23 hr ago
+1
That’s online circles of people who keep up with TV criticism, which I mentioned in my comment.
1
ambiguousembalmer23 hr ago
+2
The Wire did "have" *We Own This City*. While not really a spin off, it's created by the same guy and is thematically similar enough and could work like a gateway to get people to watch The Wire.
Though I think most people that did end up watching We Own This City already had watched The Wire.
2
kbange23 hr ago
+3
There are dozens of us who also watched Treme! David Simon has a niche he likes to navigate which is the failures of bureaucracy (Gen Kill, also fits this theme too, but less than the portraits of cities).
3
Kadde-23 hr ago
-8
Might been the best show back then but I can name 20+ shows that have more interesting and exciting characters/storylines than the wire. It will always be my biggest personal enigma how this show is rated as high as it is. It was decent like seaosn 2 but other than that it was a drag compared to many other shows.
-8
phyrros23 hr ago
+4
Considering how high the wire is rated by people in the profession it might just be that you are enjoying more fantastic storylines and characters.
4
Kadde-23 hr ago
+1
I enjoy shows that constantly keeps me on the edge of my seat and has characters that you fall in love with or just captivates you. The wire didnt have any of this except some characters in season 2 and some of the police, the storyline was also exciting in that season.
Shows like these are more up my alley: Lost, the leftovers, mr robot, person of interest, dark, the expanse, the shield, breaking bad, daredevil, fringe, andor, succession, better caul saul, agents of sheild, banshee.
1
phyrros22 hr ago
+1
the funny thing is that most people think that season 2 is the worst of all seasons but in the end the selection of the shows you like also draws a fitting picture as those shows are quite unbound by reality while the wire tries to stay close to reality.
And if you do the latter you are somewhat bound by how people are and even the most unbelieveable characters in the wire are more strictly bounded than the typical characters in the shows you named.
The wire does show its age because it tries to paint a believeable picture of a place at a time - thus it will resonate more with people which experienced this place of time.
purely imagined stories will bound by the story of their characters - and find archetypes with hold true.
The thing i liked at the wire and disliked in BB/BCS is how eg the drug trade was described. BB is absolutely fantastical in that regard while the wire is more grounded.
(dark i actively disliked and found stupid ^^)
1
Kadde-22 hr ago
+1
Yea I dont base my entire view of tv shows of how close to reality they are. That’s stupid in my opinion and just ruins your potential for an enjoyable experience.
Just because the wire was a show grounded in reality didn’t make it less of a drag to watch at a lot of times. Like sure I can admit the wire had some great stuff in it like certain wire tap moments and school kids getting dragged into that world of chaos at an early age.
But a the end of the day when I turn on a tv show I want to have an enjoyable experience and the only thing the wire truly got going was that it had some of the best black actors in the industry. They carried the show and made up for a lot of the episodes being uneventful and a drag.
1
PlantOG23 hr ago
+2
I’ll bite- let’s see that list big man
2
Kadde-23 hr ago
+1
15 is the best I can do. Lost,the leftovers, mr robot, person of interest, dark, the expanse, the shield, breaking bad, daredevil, fringe, andor, succession, better caul saul, agents of sheild, banshee.
1
PlantOG21 hr ago
+2
A lot I haven’t seen in there, thanks for the tip.
2
jamal194923 hr ago
+3
What’s your 20?
3
TheMooseIsBlue22 hr ago
+1
The performances and production were absolutely top notch. They didn’t miss a note. Ideally, you should be able to recognize that even if you don’t like the story.
I mean I can’t stand Mariah Carey’s music but I sure as shit can tell she’s an incredible talent.
1
Kadde-22 hr ago
+1
I can admit the wire was a great show but not greatest. The performances in the wire was amazing yes. Had some of the best black actors you could find. They were a big part of why the show was watchable.
But sadly the story just didnt hit most of the time, I liked the last few episodes in every season but a lot of the other episodes was just a drag, like the politics in season 3 bored me to death.
This is why I enjoyed a similar but not so similar show called the shield 10x more. It was just gripping from the start and had both really intriguing characters and story. It was pretty grounded in reality while also being over the top and making the show truly captivating.
1
TheMooseIsBlue20 hr ago
+1
“…more grounded in reality while also being over the top…”
Right.
1
Kadde-20 hr ago
Obviously not as grounded in reality as the wire but when i’m saying it was grounded in reality im talking about the case of the week episodes and the investigations, city and the way gangs worked.
Doesnt change the fact it’s a 10x more intriguing show though with better characters.
0
ItFromDawes23 hr ago
+18
All those shows are either still airing or have spinoffs airing. Better Call Saul ended very recently. Lost ended and the only brand extension was a crappy video game.
People still talk about The Wire because it genuinely is the best show ever.
18
Memphisrexjr23 hr ago
+5
Shows like Dexter and Game Of Thrones that still have new episodes or spin offs.
5
Mindless-Finance-89623 hr ago
+4
It's very much still pretty relevant I would say. Especially being 20 years old. Yeah it doesn't come up in the convo with "best tv" like Sopranos or The Wire, but it definitely feels like people quote it and make references to it more than any other show from that time period (at least from my perspective).
4
Carouselcolours23 hr ago
+3
This is like asking why nothing from the 80s was still popular in the 2000s. New media has come out since Lost that is more relevant, or have shows that spun-off. Most of the actors from Lost aren't wholly relevent anymore, or active. For example, Evangeline Lily has retired due to health.
3
longjumpingtote23 hr ago
+3
* People have heard that many of the original fans didn't like the ending.
* Lost was a long time ago, young people haven't watched it (people who are ~25 now were toddlers when it was on).
* With fewer people talking about it now, fewer people are inspired to go watch it. Shows either balloon in popularity or they dwindle. (And I say that as someone who loved it.)
* It's not really culturally relevant in the way that Sopranos or The Wire are. Or Mad Men.
* Watching it requires a pretty serious investment, there are 121 episodes which add up to more than 90 hours of content. That's more than The Wire, GOT, Sopranos, GOT, or Mad Men.
3
OreoSpeedwaggon23 hr ago
+3
I literally see "Lost" brought up in this sublistnook multiple times a month. For a 20-year-old show that captured the public zeitgeist when it came out, folks still discuss it about as much as I would expect people to. It hasn't disappeared nor been completely forgotten.
3
Sneaky_Misto_a23 hr ago
+2
I don’t know but Lost fans now have From to talk about!
2
MercurialForce23 hr ago
+4
Game of Thrones was popular in the era of social media. Lost's biggest fans congregated on message boards, not on Twitter. It was only really a phenomenon during the first season. 2004 was a long time ago.
4
Conscious-Quarter42323 hr ago
-5
How do you explain Friends? Friends ended the same time as Lost and people rewatch and quote Friends all the time
-5
tetoffens22 hr ago
+5
Because in Friends nearly every episode stands alone and you can just casually pop on any episode whenever you want? Zero commitment and a very casual watch. Lost is a 6 season commitment to get the story. You don't see the difference in the type of show they are?
5
bobarific23 hr ago
+10
I tried watching it recently and I realized that (1) it seriously benefited from being released on a weekly cadence, and (2) the final seasons were worse than Game of Thrones. It’s a f****** brutal slog to get through, and the big draw WAS trying to figure out what the hell the island was.
10
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
> and the big draw WAS trying to figure out what the hell the island was.
Was it? How?
2
bobarific16 hr ago
+1
I don’t know how to answer that, I’m not sure I get your question. People spent hours discussing it. It was almost more fun than the actual show and a lot of the ideas were better than what the show eventually came up with.
1
kuhpunkt13 hr ago
+1
It was an island. What was there to figure out? And what ideas were better? Legit curious.
1
SerDire20 hr ago
+1
Lost is my all time favorite show and it’s definitely a slog but the mystery element hooked me through the entire run. Not everything needed an answer and the final seasons kinda just shoehorned in a bunch of shit. If Lost was released today, entire characters could be dropped and you’d still get the main essence of the show.
1
ImLaunchpadMcQuack23 hr ago
+2
It didn’t become a franchise.
2
Conscious-Quarter42323 hr ago
-6
Breaking Bad didn't become a franchise. Still one of the best shows of all time
-6
fishstock23 hr ago
+4
It had a movie and a TV show spinoff.
4
ImLaunchpadMcQuack22 hr ago
+3
What were Better Call Saul and El Camino?
3
LowBalance440422 hr ago
+2
I think it's because LOST was one of the biggest "water cooler" shows ever, but one that also wasn't on any streaming, DVRs hadn't taken off yet, While tivo was out, it was $400 for the unit and like $15/month. So the show aired in kind of an inbetween time. It was also a show with hidden clues, at least one ARG, and solving the puzzles and finding the hidden symbols in each episode was a thing we all did together. Work basically stopped the morning after each episode aired. It was a cultural phenomenon that doesn't hold up when you are watching solo.
2
Blueberry_H3AD23 hr ago
+5
Some of the crew from Lost now work on From with The Russo Brothers, I know weird combo, and that show is great.
5
Andrew1990M23 hr ago
+3
WE HAVE TO GO BACK!
3
El_Cance_R23 hr ago
+3
Bad reputation from an ending that isn't the shows ending. I swear every year a new list of "wrost TV show endings ever" comes out and every time they spill the same "they were dead this whole time" bullshit.
Also it has a very unique episodes structure. 20-24 episodes were the the first seasons have a vertical structure but as the series progressed it becomes incredibly horizontal.
That episode quantity, with that kind of horizontal structure, was hard to follow for the TV audience of the time. Just like the quantity of vertical episodes of the first seasons is hard to follow for the current audience.
3
DJhedgehog23 hr ago
+3
It spent a long time asking questions and gave only some underwhelming answers.
3
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
Only gave some underwhelming answers? What?
2
scruffles36023 hr ago
+1
yeah. not exactly a sci-fi classic. It just teased for several years and didn't deliver much. XFiles did that too, but at least that was episodic so you had payoff on the story of the week. You can't have a serial story with no payoff in either the short or long term.
1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
They constantly paid off stuff.
2
yum_yum_gimme_sum17 hr ago
+1
If you've watched the show then this link may interest you if you really feel that they never paid off on anything: [Every lost mystery explained](https://www.listnook.com/r/television/comments/1fme8dt/every_lost_mystery_explained/)
1
Nuo_Vibro23 hr ago
+3
Didn’t stick the landing
3
Wonderful_Adagio934623 hr ago
+2
⛳👏🏼
I remember living in NYC, and walking through Times Square where Good Morning America is located when the final episode aired.
The final episode was broadcast on their jumbotron, but there wasn't an event. There didn't seem to be as much hullabaloo as final episodes like Cheers or Seinfeld.
I don't even recall any reaction to the finale, like we see with The Sopranos and How I Met Your Mother.
Question for the fans: Given the entire series and storylines, is it worth investing all that time to watch it?
2
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
Yes, it's a fun show.
2
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
How did it not?
2
shocksmybrain23 hr ago
+3
I watched it when it was airing and I tried a rewatch a few years ago but fell off because I know they don't give many answers and the ending is exactly what everyone guessed from the beginning but they told us over and over again was not the case.
3
yum_yum_gimme_sum23 hr ago
+2
What is the ending you were told over and over wasn’t true?
2
FrankPapageorgio23 hr ago
+6
It's amazing how many interpret that as "they were dead the whole time"
Reminds me of my ex mother in law that I swear one time was reading the newspaper during the episode then at the end went "I don't understand what is going on!"
6
shocksmybrain23 hr ago
-1
That they're in purgatory. It seemed obvious from the beginning but the creators insisted that was not the truth.
-1
yum_yum_gimme_sum23 hr ago
+1
Yeah… they weren’t dead the whole time. This bs is spread by folks who just weren’t paying attention. >!They were alive the entire show except in the flash sideways of the last season. Everything that happened on the island happened. After they died (all in their own time) they all looked for each other so that they could progress to the afterlife together.!<
1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
They constantly answered stuff and they weren't dead the whole time. How did you not understand that? When and how would they have even died?
2
mq2thez23 hr ago
+2
They blew the ending, and a lot of the later seasons really dragged as they struggled to pull together all of the disparate plot threads.
I’d say that most people these days would lump it together with GoT as another show that blew the ending and then everyone stopped talking about.
2
PablosCocaineHippo23 hr ago
+6
FInale was fantastic. S6 was not good on a whole
6
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
And how did they blow it? What's wrong with the ending?
2
feichinger23 hr ago
+2
And the colossal failure that was GoT's ending also replaced Lost as the go-to reference for terrible endings, so ... not much left to talk about with Lost.
2
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
What's terrible about the Lost ending?
2
Oasx23 hr ago
+3
In my experience the people who complain about the ending of Lost are more often than not the ones who didn’t understand it.
3
mq2thez22 hr ago
lol that’s what fans say about Rick & Morty.
I got it, I just didn’t love it.
0
Battlescarred9823 hr ago
+1
Partially because it aired before meme culture was all over the internet. So you get folks never really checked it out.
1
New_Cockroach_50523 hr ago
+1
Last episode of Lost was 2010. 16 years ago.
Dexter had a new season last year and another season coming.
GOT had a new episode last year and new seasons coming.
Breaking Bad had its last season in 2022. 4 years ago.
For the most part every series mentioned other than The Wire is still talked about because it’s still topical. Dexter and GoT still have seasons being put out. Breaking Bad only ended a few years ago franchise wise.
Wire is really the only true comparison and it’s IMO just because it’s a better show but I also very rarely see it mentioned.
1
brickmaster3200023 hr ago
+1
Let's examine the premise. If we take a snapshot of everything that is talked about today and assume that is proper what is supposed to happen 5 years from now?
There is only so much time in the day to be talking about things. So where do new shows fit in? Do you have to just never talk about new shows so that there is what you consider an acceptable amount of talk about the old shows? Do we have to talk about every good show that has ever existed every single hour of every day? Do the works of Shakespeare stop being good if you aren't bringing them up in conversation every single day? Or is it perhaps possible for a show to be good and for it to only be brought up when it is relevant and the rest of the time it just sits in the background and that isn't a slight against the show but just a practical reality?
1
tle4f23 hr ago
+1
I think one important reason is that most of the shows you mentioned come from the hbo style premium subscription tv style pioneered by shows like the sopranos. Lost is different for a few reasons. It was maybe the pinnacle of 2000s "appointment" network TV. HBO is a lot more popular now but back in 2004 way fewer people had it but basically everyone could watch ABC. Lost is a big ensemble show that explores the backstories of many different characters. The actual on-island plot was secondary in a way and mostly served as a way to reflect how the characters wanted to break from their past. For this reason it is actually harder to discuss the way more focused and limited shows are. Even shows like GOT with big ensemble casts have a more clear and conventional narrative structure. Lost's storytelling is very diffuse and scattered, but people were just watching it week to week and discussing it with friends and coworkers that week then forgetting about it. You didn't have a wiki page or ability to rewatch on demand so people were less able to review the story and characters as much as we do these days.
1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
>You didn't have a wiki page or ability to rewatch on demand so people were less able to review the story and characters as much as we do these days.
Lostpedia was a thing back then, ABC even had the episodes on their own website where you could watch the episodes for free.
2
faultysynapse23 hr ago
+1
Well, I was big into the show when it was running. It lost me, no pun intended, around season 4. From what I understand, it really failed to stick the landing when it comes to the ending on what was a great mysterious premise.
1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
It didn't fail to stick the landing.
2
staedtler201823 hr ago
+1
I talk about Lost on r/television all the time. It's a widely discussed show for how old it is.
Shows that actually disappeared are stuff like Desperate Housewives.
1
lightsongtheold22 hr ago
+1
I think the popularity of Lost vs Desperate Housewives on a place like Listnook can be explained by the user demographics. This place skews heavily male and the Desperate Housewives audience skewed female.
1
Jirachibi100023 hr ago
+1
Lost has no spinoffs afaik, is a show with a famously disliked ending, and is a long show with buttloads of episodes, which younger audiences do not like/want mostly. You would not believe how many times my nieces and nephews have asked me about a show I like like Supernatural or 2005 Doctor Who or so on about "can you make me a list of like 5-6 episodes to watch a season so i can skip the rest? its too long".
1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
> is a show with a famously disliked ending
That's a terrible narrative.
2
fire_and_spice2423 hr ago
-4
I feel like Lost was HUGE its first season but was already fading by the end.
-4
muad_dibs23 hr ago
+14
This definitely wasn’t the case.
14
fire_and_spice2423 hr ago
+2
If you look at viewership over the seasons, it was going down by the final season.
2
noble_delinquent23 hr ago
+1
It’s maybe more the case than you think. Season two premiere was the peak. It was fading by the end. DVD sales were decent.
1
I-Have-Mono23 hr ago
+4
Respectfully, wrong AF!
4
fire_and_spice2423 hr ago
Viewership definitely was at it's peak during 1 and 2. It went down after that.
0
njaana23 hr ago
+1
Nope
1
wvu_sam23 hr ago
The last few seasons and the ending were a hot mess. They should have wrapped it up sooner. The other shows you mentioned knew when to stop.
0
Amyt_Otisl23 hr ago
-2
I think the ending killed it for most people. But honestly, GoT still gets talked about way more than Lost does. So there's something else going on there too...
-2
Conscious-Quarter42323 hr ago
-7
cause the show is too smart for the ADHD Gen Z audience
-7
metametapraxis23 hr ago
-1
It wasn’t smart.
-1
dudreddit23 hr ago
OP, I’ve never actually seen a single episode of this show. My response to you query is simple … older shows live on in our memories, and our HTPCs (or streaming services). I’m just now rewatching the original Frasier series.
0
Asiriya21 hr ago
It's just a lot. For all people say that 20 episode seasons were better, there's a ton of cruft in there. The first season is really good but pretty much every season after is uneven, and I'd say a massive chunk of season 6 is a waste of time. Once you get to the end there's not a huge amount to say. Lots of the characters have fundamentally changed / are no longer themselves, a bunch of people die, and the end confused people who weren't paying attention.
I think about it a lot, but it's not on the same tier as the Wire.
Personally I think it's a show that could be remade. And edited, a lot. Explore some of the characters whose actors wanted out early, have a plan for Walt so you don't write him out when he starts aging. Be more consistent with what the island is and what it can do. Fewer red herrings that seemed cool and go nowhere.
0
Jimmymcginty23 hr ago
-5
I think it's because the show was terrible. But I obviously wasn't a fan so I'm probably not helpful here.
-5
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
How was it terrible then?
2
yum_yum_gimme_sum17 hr ago
+2
loving your replies, keep up the good fight!
2
Jimmymcginty16 hr ago
+1
I mean I was in off the start, the hype around it was wild, I feel like at least a half a dozen people told me to watch it so I gave it a shot and it was good for a few episodes. I was in until the first time you get a glimpse of the smoke monster and then I was out.
I didn't see how there could be any possible solution to the puzzle that wasn't lame or nonsense. My impression was the writers were trying to be clever but they were laying the tracks in front of the train with no clue where it was going.
I'm not saying I was correct about any of that, but the actual ending of the series wasn't something that I would have been satisfied with if I had stayed invested. I'm sure lots of people liked it, but I thought it was all foreplay and no finish.
1
kuhpunkt13 hr ago
+1
What puzzle are you talking about? And what's the actual ending?
1
Jimmymcginty12 hr ago
+1
I'm guessing you've never seen the show.
It was marketed as, not a mystery I guess, but certainly mysterious. It was intentionally written with cliffhangers and hints that there were secrets etc to get people talking about it and get them excited to see the next episode.
This is all pre-streaming, no binge watching. One episode per week and then six days to talk about it and try and guess what was going to happen next. The whole show was a big puzzle.
I wasn't being disengenuous when I said lots of people liked it so I'm not going to spoil the ending in case you might be one of them. It's very googlable in any event.
1
kuhpunkt12 hr ago
+1
I watched the show. And yeah, it was mysterious at times with a bunch of mysteries sprinkled into it along the way, but it was not "a puzzle" that you could solve. They withheld information to make you tune in the next week to find out... like "Who knocked out Sayid and destroyed his equipment?" or "Is Henry Gale telling the truth or is he one of the Others?" or "Is the button real or just an experiment?" or "Who is Ben's man/spy on the Freighter?" How is that a puzzle?
And you said you were out at the season 1 finale when you saw the smoke monster. Do you even know the ending? Like I'm all ears. What do you think is the ending?
1
PolyAdvocate23 hr ago
-1
I have strong feelings about LOST. Here's my take on LOST: I loved LOST. I was there for every episode, as they aired. I was there for every up and down, every character death (they way they killed Boone still haunts me and pisses me off). LOST was simultaneously some of the best (the episode where Desmond says "I love you, Penny" before turning the key is probably my favorite) and worst television I've ever seen. And then in that last season it became apparent that the writers had no idea how they should to end it, that they'd wrote themselves into a corner, and we got that metaphysical circle jerk of a finale. LOST stole six years of my life. F*** LOST.
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
How did that become apparent? Why do you say that they had no idea how to end it? They wrote themselves into a corner? What corner would that be?
2
someone_like_me23 hr ago
-1
"Lost" ended up with some rights issues. The guy who created it-- Jeffrey Lieber, who is listed as the show's creator-- had to sue to get his rights. The network execs saw Lieber's pitch and then decided to rip his ideas without paying him.
That entire incident probably makes derivative shows less valuable to ABC. They might have to give him a chunk of the money off the top.
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
There are no rights issues. That issue was resolved before the show even premiered. And derivative shows? What are you talking about?
2
Complete_Entry23 hr ago
-1
Mystery Box has yet to drop a satisfying ending, and I don't think it can.
Like in a cohesive narrative, you can't just keep doing buildup and skip out on answers. Mystery is one thing "We decided not to focus on that" is not.
It's bad writing.
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
What are you talking about?
2
Complete_Entry15 hr ago
Mystery box. JJ Abram's crutch.
0
kuhpunkt13 hr ago
+1
Lost is a TV show. A story. Abrams didn't even write it. So what are you talking about?
1
jasonite23 hr ago
-1
It joins the pile of popular shows that don't have lasting power
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
But it does.
2
NotAUserNamm23 hr ago
-1
That is because Lost was terrible
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
How so?
2
Kimosabae18 hr ago
-1
Because people hated the final seasons and ending and anyone saying anything else is pure revisionist history.
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+1
Acknowledging facts is revisionist now?
1
Measure7618 hr ago
-1
Why has everyone abandoned a show that pissed off its fans every season and then again at the finale?
Complete mystery to me.
Don't get me wrong, I loved the characters and even the individual episodes of the show, and I'm very aware of all the apologetics that make sense of the twists and turns...
But the average viewer is not going to want to think that deeply about it, and will just remain pissed off about the infinite number of bait n switches in the show's run.
-1
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
+2
What?
2
taa7145823 hr ago
-2
121 hour long episodes seems like a lot for someone to commit to
-2
Sloppykrab23 hr ago
+3
They are only 45 minutes long.
I've committed to watching Chicago Fire shows, I've seen them all, it's not much of a commitment to sit down on a couch and to watch something decent.
3
AlxanderMorningstar23 hr ago
-2
Because no matter how many people say that the show answered all its questions, we all know it’s not true. The show was amazing at the beginning and then it went completely nuts. Hardly anything made any sense.
-2
kuhpunkt17 hr ago
What are you talking about? And hardly anything made sense? What do you mean?
0
PraetorianAE23 hr ago
-2
Then maybe it wasn’t the biggest show on television.
-2
yum_yum_gimme_sum17 hr ago
+1
At the time it really was.
1
Criplor23 hr ago
-2
Hot take: lost was the squid game of its time. Very exciting premise with a disappointing pay off. And then they added way more seasons because it was printing money.
128 Comments