Will Forte & D'Arcy Carden's new Hulu show Sunny Nights is 100% on Rotten Tomatoes

Hot Soccermom

Haha it actually works

That’s so cool. It was such a surprise my parents and I had to rewind to be sure we weren’t imagining it.

Samberg wasn't really at the time either though, more just a face that people might recognise from SNL, which is pretty much the same for Forte

JUSTICE IS BACK IN THE MENU, BOYS!!

D’arcy playing Eleanor impersonating Jason always cracks me up.

She’s so impressive. Just freaking love her

The Rottentomatoes scoring system is more of an aggregate score representing positive reviews (60% or better). A show with all 6/10 reviews would be 100% under the system.

> Show's got a 77/7.4 on metacritic, seems a lot more plausible Getting 77 out of 7.4 is over ten times the maximum! That doesn't sound plausible at all!

Must have been reviewed by members of the Star Trek sub Most hilarious dissonance I've seen is watching Picard S2 with the internet's general reaction, and then browsing into the star trek sub where everyone is talking about the show like it's Citizen Kane.

Probably 30-40℅ for first two seasons then 60 for season 3 You can check out my longer reply above, but TLDR the writing is very poor across the board. Bad dialog, bad charscters, and very plot hole filled nonsense storylines. It also changes/ignores a lot of established canon and design. Star Trek is of course always nonsense storylines, but there's a difference between fun nonsense that allows for analogies and situations that makes you think differently about the world, and empty action filler nonsense. Picard is unfortunately the latter. Season 3 is much better. Finally actually see the TNG crew doing stuff together. But the show is still overly reliant on a franticly changing, mellow dramatic, and poorly written storyline. EDIT: Changed my response to give you a better answer and not just a copy paste of my other comment.

* Ignored a bunch of established Canon. Romulans being poor refugees after one planet is destroyed when they actually had hundreds of planets. Season 1 forgets Lore existed. Floating holograms everywhere. Brand new Borg design. Angry unprofessional starfleet. People living in poverty on earth. Etc etc etc etc * Very non sensical plots in 1 and 2 and most of 3. The galaxy is at stake! Picard becomes a robot. There's Borg. Wait no there's AI robots. Oh also changelings! What if we time travel now? Picard had a baby and Beverly kept it a secret? Oh my! Oh hey Q! Nevermind guess he's gone now. Yay Wesley is randomly here for the robot girl now. * Terrible camera work. VERY dark lighting and set design. * Costume design looks like everyone went to the black leather store in 2006. Ooo and see how we colored peoples hair with stripes? * Weak characters and introductions. The elf guy with a sword just exists with a sword the whole time. Then he kills a hallway full of people armed with phasers... with a sword. It's so ridiculous. * Using brief extreme violence for shock value rather than carrying anything along for the plot. * Stilted and rough dialogue. Character mellow drama takes center stsge. They talk a lot without actually saying much. * No thoughtful exploration of current issues and ideas like TNG did. Current issues are there but it's like, "some people get annoyed by the refugee romulans, but Picard knocked down a sign to show that racism is bad!" No actual exploration of the ideas of bigotry, past traumas, racial unease, misinformation, etc. Everything is extremely surface level in an action movie sorta way. TNG really made you think about moral ideas and problems, but this show was rather mindless. Season 3 was a better course correction but drifted too far into fan fic, ridiculous plots (oh no the Borg are back, and also changelings, and everything is so hacked we're the only ones nor hacked), and of course more mellow drama. I just couldn't take it seriously as any kind of follow-up to the original show. That all being said I'm not trying to be too superior elitist. If you enjoyed it, that's totally ok. Different television for different people is ok.

Exactly, and most of the reviews are like 3 or 4 out of 5 Even a 3 or 4 out of 5 is a pretty generous review for this shows first two seasons. 4 is even generous for S3. But I guess I am critical of it. If the reviews were more critical or at least polarized it would take the score to where I think it should be in the 30s and 40s. The RT reviews are pretty gentle to positive on the show overall and it reflects in the overall score of 85 percent. I think the RT score reflects the vibe of the overly positive reviews accurately and I'm not misunderstanding its meaning. The whole point of RT is that a higher percentage score means more reviewers generally think it's good. More reviewers generally thought Picard was good. And that's just kinda crazy lol

Yeah. They posted the trailer. 

oh i also double loved Upright

they do make them like that, but generally tend not to do as well. you usually want a build up of tension, instead of start at the peak then tumble by the second episode. some shows also tout themselves as "high adrenaline" that try to maintain a consistent high tension throughout the entire season, this can also burn out the watcher, especially if each episode ends in a cliffhanger. i think "24" tried to make this its style. [This Tension and release cycle](https://i0.wp.com/matthewsonmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Star-Wars-Story-Arc.gif?ssl=1) shown by the star wars story arc is usually how you want things to go. You can further break it down into the three Acts with Luke's parent's dying or Alderaan being destroyed as the end of Act 1 and Obi-wan dying the end of Act2.

I dunno, rolling your eyes is pretty calm behavior!