· 43 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 25, 2026 at 7:24 PM

Young women feel left behind under Trump’s economy

Posted by 19thnews

https://19thnews.org/2026/03/young-women-economy-trump/
🚩 Report this post

43 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Ontheragnarock Mar 25, 2026 +45
That’s a big part of the Project 2025 plan.
45
biscuitarse Mar 25, 2026 +20
Yes their plan for women is pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen
20
FrankieMint Mar 25, 2026 +11
And Project 2025 has a role for all those young women. It's called TradWife.
11
New_Alternative8711 Mar 25, 2026 +18
Was project 2025 not a big enough clue for everybody?
18
ToadP Mar 25, 2026 +6
Yeah we Know... If you Ain't Blond and kissing fat old guys asses then you left behind as a woman. Didn't you all see the Cliffs notes?
6
B-Z_B-S Mar 25, 2026 +16
MAGA hates women who aren't under the control of random incel bullies.
16
Forsaken_Ant7459 Mar 25, 2026 +4
Well let’s not forget many, even if a smaller number compared to the MAGA idiot men, voted for this, I’ve never been able to fathom this
4
citizenjones Mar 25, 2026 +4
If you're going to *franchise* supremacy You have to disenfranchise the hell out of everyone else. Right-wing think tanks putting decades of info into motion.
4
YesterShill Mar 25, 2026 +20
Everyone but the top .1% is being left behind.
20
GreaterTriumph Mar 25, 2026 -2
Yeah like men are fucked more even I bet
-2
RealBrobiWan Mar 25, 2026 +4
Uhhh, everybody is left behind
4
Spottswoodeforgod Mar 25, 2026 +11
As opposed to everyone else who is surging ahead...
11
Spam_Hand Mar 25, 2026 +7
Wow, the women I know describe it more as being "raped of our rights" but I guess the economy is a much bigger factor... sure.
7
FormerUsenetUser Mar 25, 2026 +4
Both actually.
4
FormerUsenetUser Mar 25, 2026 +6
I am so glad to hear a counter to the "young \*men\* are suffering economically." It's everybody except the 1%!
6
milkywayyprincess Mar 25, 2026 +8
A lot of young women are saying they feel economically invisible right now. Wages in female-dominated fields haven’t kept up, childcare and housing costs are crushing, and many feel the “economic boom” narrative doesn’t include them. Whether it’s policy failure or just perception, this is something the administration should take seriously instead of dismissing it as “fake news.”
8
Biokabe Mar 25, 2026 +3
Are you just too focused on your own particular problems to not be aware of the bigger picture? EVERYONE that is not wealthy is economically invisible right now. Wages in male-dominated fields haven't kept up either. Housing costs are crushing for everyone not in the 1%, and the "economic boom" narrative has never held up for anyone not in the investor class. The administration doesn't give two shits about anyone not in a position to give them hefty bribes. Suggesting that the administration should "take it seriously" suggests that this administration takes any concerns of working class Americans seriously. They don't. They don't care at all about anyone that works for a living. They don't dismiss articles like this as fake news. They dismiss articles like this as irrelevant to their goals.
3
Wandering_butnotlost Mar 25, 2026 +2
Old men do too.
2
chilidetective Mar 25, 2026 +3
Will these young women vote?
3
androidnoobbaby Mar 25, 2026 +10
Black women will, they're one of the most reliable voting groups.
10
chilidetective Mar 25, 2026 +5
I agree 100%. They are the voting block I identify with the most as far as policies. I wish more people voted along their lines.
5
moreliketurdcrapley Mar 25, 2026 +3
…yes?
3
chilidetective Mar 25, 2026
Good then they should vote for the party that will support them (blue).
0
moreliketurdcrapley Mar 25, 2026 +1
Obviously.
1
chilidetective Mar 25, 2026
Is it though? Numbers have been down.
0
moreliketurdcrapley Mar 25, 2026 +3
Is “young women” really the demographic we need to be the most concerned about re: voting right now? This is so condescending to women.
3
chilidetective Mar 25, 2026 -1
Read the article?
-1
moreliketurdcrapley Mar 25, 2026 +2
Yes, which is why your whole line of commentary is condescending because it doesn’t match the content of the article—you come across as a man who is judgmental of women. Why on earth would your takeaway be, “yeah but will these young women [read: 15 total women in 2 focus groups] vote? they should vote for the party that will support them (Blue)”. Isn’t the whole point of the article more tied to the idea: “There’s lots of ways that we are not giving women who make up a majority of the electorate the attention that their numbers warrant.”? Shouldn’t your takeaway be that young women are overlooked as a critical voting bloc and that the focus on jaded white young men during the 2024 election had detrimental effects? I worded my comment poorly in that I was trying to articulate that it is uncomfortable and condescending for a man to read this article & his response to the information presented to be “well these young women had better vote.” Like young women are the problem.
2
chilidetective Mar 25, 2026 +3
Well hell maybe we got off on the wrong foot. I agree 100% with that point. I got three daughters (one proud trans daughter). Two of them are 18-22 years of age. I've talked to their friends etc. None of them are enthusiastically wanting to vote. Maybe my personal experience is clouding the point. Our voting public measured as a sum of all demographics has a horrible voting percentage. But even those that do vote, do so against their own interests. Case in point white women in general did themselves a horrible disservice in 2024. I consider white men (my specific voting demo) to be utterly lost. We will vote for the worst dogshit. I hate it. I hate that "manosphere" podbro culture that helped trump beat Harris. I was a big Harris fan other than her stance on Israel. I'm a old grumpy progressive that will probably die before this failed country ever elects a progressive liberal president. I do think women deserve better representation in all aspects of government. In short. I was being rude because I'm tired. Tired of the state of things. I appreciate you detailed response. I agree with you and understand your point. My apologies.
3
moreliketurdcrapley Mar 26, 2026 +1
I really appreciated this comment and your sincerity and warmth. Thank you for sharing more about your perspective and experience. And thanks for reminding me that we’re on the same side and I want to engage in this stuff without defaulting to a bad faith reading.
1
rare-cheeser Mar 26, 2026 +1
They are trying to disenfranchise women from voting; So tired of people who complain though, who didn’t f*cking vote
1
chilidetective Mar 26, 2026 +1
I hope the midterms go well
1
Apathetic_Zealot Mar 25, 2026 -10
When young men felt left behind they formed incel groups and ideology. Women already have feminism but that clearly hasn't worked. Now it's time for women driven incel ideology. I want Adriana Taint, Nicole Fuentes, and Pelvicular (Pelvis + Clavicular).
-10
Gleemonex4Pets Mar 25, 2026 +9
Women separatist movements already exist. The difference between them and incels is that incels want to push their way into women's lives *because they feel entitled to women's attention*, whereas Women Separatists feel entitled to being left the f*** alone and not constantly harassed by men. See the difference?
9
Apathetic_Zealot Mar 25, 2026 -2
Did you think my recommendation for Andriana Taint and Pelvicular was a serious comment?
-2
Gleemonex4Pets Mar 25, 2026 +2
i think when people make uninformed comments about women incels that they should be corrected
2
MarlinMaverick Mar 26, 2026 -1
There’s no such thing as an involuntarily celibate woman 
-1
Apathetic_Zealot Mar 26, 2026 -1
How "Femcels" Differ From Incels [Source](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-modern-heart/202211/how-do-femcels-and-incels-differ) From femcels to ‘femcelcore’: Women’s involuntary celibacy and the rise of heteronihilism [Source](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13675494241293731)
-1
[deleted] Mar 26, 2026 +1
[removed]
1
Apathetic_Zealot Mar 26, 2026 -1
First you think my "snide comments" needed correcting and when I post an actual source on the subject we need to be cautious? My goal with this other guy was just to show they exist. If you want to be the real Adriana Taint and lead/define the movement I'll leave it to you.
-1
Gleemonex4Pets Mar 26, 2026
Sources should be vetted for reliability and validity, it's part of the scientific method. you are spreading misinformation about women and you should stop
0
Apathetic_Zealot Mar 26, 2026 +1
Sage Journal and Psychology Today are generally reputable. But ok keep missing the point to fuel your indignantion. >Misinformation about women I'm literally bringing sources and you confused incels as all being separatists and MGTOWs while missing the obvious intended humor in my original point. But ok Adriana, I'll leave it to you to spread misinformation.
1
Gleemonex4Pets Mar 26, 2026 +1
No, I specifically avoided your dumb "joke" that female incels could solve women's problems, and focused instead on *female separatism*, which is an actual attempt to solve the issue. Because women feeling *left behind* in the economy isn't solved by women incels trying to find more d*** to f***. But it's interesting that you thought that was a funny way to respond. Shows just how out of touch you are. i then pointed out that the "research" you presented to others was not very high quality. for the others, because it is pretty clear that you have no real interest in understanding the issue. You then replied >If you want to be the real Adriana Taint >ok Adriana see what you're doing there? at no time have i called you names or denigrated you, i have merely disagreed with you and told you that your opinions are misinformed. I am done with you, have a good night.
1
← Back to Board