ListNook

BiologyJ Apr 10, 2026 +2256

It was the US

2256

9248763629 Apr 10, 2026 +418

Probably lot of countries like India who are now buying oil from russian, thanks to trumpet

418

kvothe5688 Apr 10, 2026 +245

india is not Ukraine's partner though. probably US and Euro nation

245

DividedState Apr 10, 2026 +26

Maybe they should be. Ukraine could use Trumps tactics of extortion and say support us or say bye bye to Russian oil. Give an ultimatum and shit.

26

Fancy_Caramel9087 Apr 10, 2026 +77

Yeah, Dumps ultimatums work out great. They work great like nobodys ever seen before.

77

alexefi Apr 10, 2026 +20

you dont write a book about making a deals when you arent master of making deals../s

20

userhwon Apr 10, 2026 +7

Master of hiring ghost writers who don't fact-check, tho...

7

Dangeroustrend Apr 10, 2026 +18

India is more aligned with Russia than the US Contrary to American beliefs, many countries want to move away from American influence. Especially now lest they want the head of state to be kidnapped or their people bombed

18

Helios0186 Apr 10, 2026 +11

Still, replacing USA by Russia? It's like replacing cholera for Typhus...

11

Drakelth Apr 11, 2026 +4

Any country with any sense is dropping involvement with the us like their radioactive

4

IrvinRatbag Apr 10, 2026 +3

Calling it "tactics" is quite a stretch.

3

Oh_ffs_seriously Apr 10, 2026 +7

Nah, India simply doesn't see Russia as the bad guys. Everyone has their favourite empire (or remnants thereof), I guess.

7

Irr3l3ph4nt Apr 10, 2026 +7

Yeah nah. It's just oil and gas. C**** oil and gas rule the world.

7

systonia_ Apr 10, 2026 +3

Two weeks!!

3

ZumboPrime Apr 11, 2026 +1

That's a poor attitude and only a long-term strategy for superpowers that can back up threats with force. Ukraine is more in a position where they can make long-term agreements through partnership. Why alienate potential partners when business-like approach works just fine?

1

NinjaCupcake_ Apr 11, 2026 +1

And kill the remaining dwindling public support of the countries which fund ukraine? This whole do what we say or else!!! Sht hasnt worked for the US, what on earth makes you think that it works for that massive money sink that is the Ukraine defense. Theres a reason hes not calling specific countries out, and thats not because hes such a nice guy. He knows he cant allow ukraine to end up on the bad side of them. But a more hush hush statement will make the pro ukraine crowd in those countries louder, because now they can just guess who it is, theres no attack against them or against their country, but the general perception of "Who the f*** wants to suck off russia now!?"

1

Hipsthrough100 Apr 10, 2026 +5

India is still buying oil from Iran

5

SandVir Apr 10, 2026 +2

Not eu, they can't buy Russian oil

2

OtherwiseDrinkMore Apr 11, 2026 +2

They can’t buy it directly, but they still buy it.

2

AnAncientBog Apr 10, 2026 +10

The term "partner" suggests that the request comes from a nation that is giving support to Ukraine and therefore it's one that merits consideration.

10

BringBackAoE Apr 10, 2026 +4

India has been buying oil from Russia, delivered through Iran, since forever.

4

boraam Apr 10, 2026 +6

~~Triumph~~ himself likely asked them. Damn autocorrect

6

cxmmxc Apr 10, 2026 +5

You might want to check that typo.

5

RursusSiderspector Apr 10, 2026 +2

Ttump. By the orange misfit's own spelling.

2

Tasmosunt Apr 10, 2026 +1

Triumph is a good ironic nickname for him

1

KerashQSA Apr 10, 2026 +4

Ukraine has blamed India for funding Russia a plenty of times, why would they suddenly call it 'an unnamed partner' ?

4

paco_in_ut Apr 10, 2026 +1

Rusty Trumpet?

1

GatorNator83 Apr 10, 2026 +1

Yeah no, it was the US

1

twitterfluechtling Apr 10, 2026 +57

I hope it was not the EU, but I wouldn't bet. Global oil supply affects all countries negatively, even those not directly buying from Russia. Some countries just see Russia earning money as worse than higher oil prices.

57

Draano Apr 10, 2026 +29

UK's Starmer said recently that he's sick of countries like the US and Russia screwing up oil prices.

29

twitterfluechtling Apr 10, 2026 +11

Well, that's a sentiment I'm sure all his EU pendants share, and a quite understandable one. The problem is blaming/approaching Ukraine about it. As Ukraine allies, we should imo agree that Russia earning big oil-money is worse than higher oil prices due to less supply.

11

albertohall11 Apr 10, 2026 +8

That wasn’t his point. His point was that the U.K. needs to become energy self-sufficient instead of being dependent on overseas sources that can be interrupted by third parties.

8

Glittering-Quote-635 Apr 10, 2026 +25

I think most countries dont see it that way, in reality. I personally want Russia to lose and I am willing to pay more at the pump or for goods to see that reality happen as I think its in our strategic interests. Having said that, most people I know could care less about Ukraine.. I mean they nominally support them, but if you tell them its going to cost them another $.50c/Gallon, that support will evaporate. Same thing I think goes for our Government in general (Including Biden Administration). they want to help but not at any cost to their own economy. So, the trick is getting Russia to lose w/o taking any sort of Economic hit. Not agreeing with it, but I think that is the reality..

25

twitterfluechtling Apr 10, 2026 +4

I think Biden (and politicians in general) are most interested in public perception of costs. Higher gas prices are immediately noticed, that's bad for the election. Higher national debt is not necessarily that easily felt. The Democratic government cares about getting elected, but I think they do see strategic value worth paying for in devastating Russia. Republicans, on the other hand... In the EU, I think there is a tiny bit more willingness to accept higher prices in order to help Ukraine, but that's mainly because we are geographically closer, and Russia does a lot of provocative shit here, so it gets more personal for us. (Still, if you'd put more emphasize on the cost due to Ukraine war, I'm pretty sure quite a lot of people would be OK to leave them hanging if it just means lower prices.)

4

Corpus76 Apr 10, 2026 +2

> Having said that, most people I know could care less about Ukraine.. Probably depends on where you live. In my country at least, support for Ukraine is almost a given. People look at you strangely if you suggest not supporting them 100%. (I was a bit cautious about this topic at first since I didn't want to step on any toes, but everyone I've met have been confused by my apparent reticence.) Of course, I can totally see things being different in the US. Our country shares a land border with Russia so it seems more urgent.

2

iDareToDream Apr 10, 2026 +4

The flip side is Ukraine should keep doing it since higher gas prices might be the thing that convinces enough Americans to vote Democrat in the mid terms.

4

joelfarris Apr 10, 2026 +3

Oh please tell us this is not the plan, cause in the U.S., we're not even close to the last administration's peak gas prices, so if that's gonna work as a motivating factor for voting, prices would pretty much have to more than double from where they are now, or people won't truly care enough, especially if prices stop spiking, or even slightly head down by that point. There's gotta be a better plan than relying on the price of a gallon six months from now, yeah?

3

iDareToDream Apr 10, 2026 +2

I don't think Ukraine is relying on this as some grand strategy. I'm saying it's a happy accident if their military strategy has a helping hand in swaying the midterms. But they have no incentive to stop striking Russian energy infrastructure since it's helping them with the actual war.

2

Gh0sth4nd Apr 10, 2026 +3

Could be US and EU both. And frankly while it would hurt me too i would say f*** it and bomb the shit out of them. We are humans we only change in the hour of need and when that need has passed we go back to being convenient. We need to cut our dependency on Oil as a whole. It will hurt a lot of lives but its either now or never.

3

Special_Street_2922 Apr 10, 2026 +1

I totally agree! Let the refineries and ports burn! It probably is also the most cost effective way (instead of giving weapons (nobody seems to have anymore) to Ukraine) to cause Russia some serious challenges in long run. With oil money, they can keep on producing weapons, but without the money, who knows? In addition, very high oil prices just might encourage previously neutral countries to finally take interest and perhaps even put some pressure on Putin. Because of the US war, now is the best time for Ukraine to act!

1

big_daddy68 Apr 10, 2026 +13

Always the ones you most expect.

13

thirdeyeballin Apr 10, 2026 +5

Couldn’t be more obvious that Donald is compromised by Russia. Yet so many people still don’t see it

5

ReddFro Apr 10, 2026 +3

Maybe, but the US has choked off aid since Trump came to power and plenty of partners use Russian oil. So, if the US says not to I doubt it carries the weight it did under Biden, whereas if say a major European country said this it’d be a different story.

3

anachronistic_circus Apr 10, 2026 +3

little doubt US is in there, but partners... plural

3

WayAdmirable150 Apr 10, 2026 +3

they dont sound like "partners"

3

MayorMcCheezz Apr 10, 2026 +2

Witkoff asked for Putin.

2

4gotAboutDre Apr 10, 2026 +2

And I wonder if the US even said thank you to Zelensky.

2

taisui Apr 10, 2026 +2

"I can't say who it is, but he is huge and orange."

2

Money_Do_2 Apr 10, 2026 +2

It was half the world, desperate for oil.

2

mpgd Apr 10, 2026 +1

> “I don't know if we'll be able to do that. I don't know if we're willing to do that" >“They're not fools. They're very smart, in a certain way. I say they're lousy fighters, but they're great negotiators"

1

EDM_DeathMatch Apr 10, 2026 +1

To be fair a good chunk of Europe is still using Russian oil, they are just paying the India tax on it.

1

qatanah Apr 11, 2026 +1

men in suits.

1

Shadowlance23 Apr 10, 2026 +124

As we say in Australia, "Yeah, Nah."

124

Commercial_Radio2919 Apr 10, 2026 +19

Wadiyatalkinabeet?

19

Gerard-Gerardieu Apr 10, 2026 +4

Ukraine should hire Scott Ryan to deliver this

4

unematti Apr 11, 2026 +2

"that's not a war, THIS is a war" - Ukraine to US, probably.

2

SheevShady Apr 11, 2026 +1

Yeahnahyeah, nah

1

ArchCerberus Apr 11, 2026 +1

As we say in Austria, "Yeah, Nein."

1

Shadowlance23 Apr 11, 2026 +1

I visited Austria about 15 years ago. Absolutely loved it.

1

Slippery-ape Apr 10, 2026 +320

Cool, give them the firepower to attack everything else then

320

Chaiboiii Apr 10, 2026 +112

They will not because the US wants Russia to win

112

Transkei_Daisy Apr 10, 2026 +24

I think they prefer the forever war. Keeps Russia occupied.

24

Chaiboiii Apr 10, 2026 +47

Not Trump and his kind. They think they can carve up the world for themselves.

47

O_PLUTO_O Apr 10, 2026 +5

Unfortunately, it’s Ukraine who is occupied.

5

Notorious_Junk Apr 10, 2026 +6

Not US, Trump. Trump is the asset. His supporters are just too f****** dumb to see it.

6

TheModWhoShaggedMe Apr 10, 2026 +21

Trump is not alone. The 285 Republicans in Congress are also compromised for they will not impeach and remove him for ten years despite having infinite reasons to do so for the sake of the public common good and safety.

21

OreillyAddict Apr 10, 2026 +3

The US *Government* wants Russia to win

3

Jellicent-Leftovers Apr 11, 2026 +1

Nope Europe / US goal has always been a stalemate that drains Russian resources.

1

TheDarthSnarf Apr 10, 2026 +216

The reason 'partners' is in quotes is that when named they are likely: Donald Trump, JD Vance, Viktor Orbán, and Robert Fico.

216

unematti Apr 11, 2026 +2

I feel uninformed, I know 3, but who's Fico?

2

Kaltias Apr 11, 2026 +4

PM of Slovakia, who's aligned with Orban and shields him from most consequences on the EU side (Because the procedure to suspend the voting rights of a member requires every other member to agree) which he has been doing ever since PiS was voted out of the Polish government

4

The_Grinning_Reaper Apr 10, 2026 +222

Name & shame all of them.

222

Eckes24 Apr 10, 2026 +102

D. Trump. Not that is too obvious. Donald T.

102

Winterplatypus Apr 10, 2026 +4

> without naming which countries or how the request was communicated. I won't name names but it was communicated by a long incoherent post on truth social.

4

mccirus Apr 10, 2026 +3

I understood that reference

3

Noreng Apr 10, 2026 +6

I think it's more likely that it was some of the bigger EU countries, like Germany. Trump doesn't really care about the oil supply to countries that aren't the US.

6

KooZ2 Apr 10, 2026 +7

> Trump doesn't really care about the oil supply to countries that aren't the US. Well, with the surge in oil prices the US lifted the sanctions on RU Oil so....

7

Toads_Of_Fun Apr 10, 2026 +5

Might be Belgium.

5

Eckes24 Apr 10, 2026 +10

He cares what his buddy Putin tells him.

10

Ultra_Metal Apr 10, 2026 +9

He can't because he might lose support and Ukraine cannot afford that.

9

Several-Opposite-746 Apr 10, 2026 +6

The only support from the U.S. is that they are dealing/profiting in weapon sales to Europe, who in turn donate those weapons to Ukraine. But they still wouldn't want to endanger that supply.

6

tegat Apr 10, 2026 +3

That would be a very stupid move from him. The same partners are very likely giving him money and other support (cough... Germany). He has nothing to gain by naming and shaming. Only alienation.

3

BestFriendWatermelon Apr 10, 2026 +1

I'll give you a clue. It starts with "U" and ends with "nited States of America"...

1

clamorous_owle Apr 10, 2026 +104

Ukraine should increase attacks on Russian oil infrastructure until Putin stops bombing apartment blocks, maternity hospitals, and school playgrounds in Ukraine. It wasn't Ukraine which started this war. If you have leverage, use it.

104

Astralsketch Apr 10, 2026 +12

they have been very good at doing just that recently. Sure, that hurts the global economy, but I don't blame ukraine for doing what they gotta do.

12

dirtyasseating Apr 10, 2026 +69

Ukraine should be doubling down on refinery attacks. The war in Iran has really been a gift to Russia. Hitting them as prices are increasing will stop them from taking advantage of the situation.

69

UnoriginalStanger Apr 10, 2026 +11

Ukraine could but Ukraine also relies on western nations supplying them with money, goods, arms and intel so they have find the right line to walk.

11

AleXstheDark Apr 10, 2026 +5

I doubt there is more than 1 country in Europe against Ukraine attacks at Russian refineries.

5

Gackey Apr 10, 2026 +4

Hungary and Slovakia make at least 2 European countries against. You can probably throw Germany on the list as well if we're going to be honest.

4

CoffeePlzzzzzz Apr 10, 2026 +2

Could you explain where you get that idea about Germany from? We are a pretty staunch supporters of Ukraine...?

2

latentnomrn Apr 10, 2026 +38

Zelenskyy’s response was actually pretty fair: he basically said he’d stop hitting their energy if they stopped hitting ours. It’s hard to listen to "partners" tell you to hold back when your own power grid is being turned into scrap metal every other night. Diplomacy is a lot easier when you’re not the one sitting in the dark.

38

I_call_Shennanigans_ Apr 10, 2026 +8

Not to mention all the "partners" that forced Ukraine to fight with one hand tied to their back. This is on them as musmch as it is on Ukraine. Everything from starlinkn suddenly not working close to Russia, to missiles not beeing able to strike Russia. It's been a disgrace all along.

8

SgtPretty Apr 10, 2026 +85

The hypocrisy is real. Give ‘em hell Ukraine! 🇺🇦 thank you for your continued support of all of Europe’s freedom. We owe you everything.

85

Vlad_TheImpalla Apr 10, 2026 +15

Hungary, Slovakia, USA.

15

Possible-Fudge-2217 Apr 12, 2026 +1

I just hope my country (Germany) wasn't part of it. He should have name dropped them, so we know what bs our leaders do.

1

skinnnymike Apr 10, 2026 +14

He who shall not be named. ^(Unless he was name thousands of times in the Epstein files)

14

SwedeLostInCanada Apr 10, 2026 +28

F*** those guys

28

MotanulScotishFold Apr 10, 2026 +19

Funny that they ask the victim to not fight back instead of asking the aggressor to stop. I'm 100% sure that the unnamed partners are US.

19

H0163R Apr 10, 2026 +34

We need oil, but do it anyway. The oil crisis will sooner or later be fixed and we need to end the Ukraine war now, so f*** em up.

34

JrYo15 Apr 10, 2026 +12

Invest jn renewables like we do oil and it fixes itself. The whole oil and dollar gambit altogether is nonsense. The sun and wind make more than enough energy. Oil just gives rich pricks the ability to f*** up everyone else's day

12

Oniriggers Apr 10, 2026 +7

You cause the Russian government as much pain as you need President Zelensky, all freedom loving Americans support the Ukrainian struggle for Independence. Slava Ukraini!!!!!!!

7

Elegant_Emu952 Apr 10, 2026 +9

Trump is working on Putin's behalf as usual.

9

Maximum-Diet-6976 Apr 10, 2026 +5

Putler and Trumpler, same stage of H*tler

5

Nim0y Apr 10, 2026 +6

Definitely my county, Trump loves Russia

6

LayneLowe Apr 10, 2026 +5

" I'm sorry but this is a war, it's existential for us. We're going to do everything we can to defend our sovereignty. You can either help or you can get it out of the way, we are going to bomb their oil industry into the stone age"

5

z01z Apr 10, 2026 +6

sorry, all i heard was "attack oil refineries", got it!

6

kritikally_akklaimed Apr 10, 2026 +6

"Unnamed"... obviously the US, Hungary, and Slovakia.

6

Mumbert Apr 10, 2026 +5

"Stop doing things to win your war, please! You are making our decisions look bad!"

5

Haru1st Apr 10, 2026 +4

Ok, so how do we screw Russia out of receiving payments for these exports then. The proceeds need to make their way back into Russia one way or another, even if they are elusive while liquid.

4

UnoriginalStanger Apr 10, 2026 +2

Easiest way is to re-open the strait of hormuz.

2

I_call_Shennanigans_ Apr 10, 2026 +3

Hope the told them "suure". And how weird about those refineries exploding all by themselves. Typical Russian construction 🤷

3

CaptainMagnets Apr 10, 2026 +5

Zelensky is like "We don't actually have to say who it was who asked because everyone on the planet will know who we are talking about"

5

YarpsDrittAdrAtta Apr 10, 2026 +3

Were they wearing suits? Did they say thank you? Did Zelensky say they didn't have any cards?

3

Confident-Spirit-680 Apr 10, 2026 +4

Nah. Keep going. If Europe and the US had taken the invasion as seriously as they should have, this entire thing would be wrapped up already and we'd be able to lean on Russian oil to help get through this crisis. These are the consequences of inaction. Keep bombing.

4

Dilosaurus-Rex Apr 10, 2026 +12

America. Probably America

12

bard329 Apr 10, 2026 +5

No probably about it. We all know who it was.

5

Boys4Ever Apr 10, 2026 +8

Who could that possibly be 🤔

8

cxmmxc Apr 10, 2026 +6

Unnamed orange partners.

6

ComprehensiveCake463 Apr 10, 2026 +3

Seems like Ukraine should get some major help in exchange for not blowing up Russian oil

3

Teddy_Pocketwatch Apr 10, 2026 +3

His name was Tronald Dump

3

Shills_for_fun Apr 10, 2026 +2

Donal Tronk

2

Foodspec Apr 10, 2026 +3

Attack them harder

3

User_extraordinar Apr 10, 2026 +3

I would bet on Hungary.

3

Cyzax007 Apr 10, 2026 +3

It is working then... More attacks needed..

3

ThePlasticSturgeons Apr 10, 2026 +3

The United States (Trump) is unnamed partners, and he’s asking on behalf of one of his two owners.

3

Stennan Apr 10, 2026 +3

But were the partners speaking on their own behalf, or on Russia's behalf? Either way, keep offering Russia an "energy system truce". As long as they keep attacking civilian infrastructure, Ukraine will keep up with "Kinetic Sanctions on Russia's War Economy".

3

Unlikely-Complex3737 Apr 10, 2026 +3

100% the US

3

Intrepid_Top_2300 Apr 10, 2026 +3

Let me guess….

3

Altruistic-Medium-23 Apr 10, 2026 +3

Starts with U ends with S.A

3

InevitableAvalanche Apr 10, 2026 +3

I wonder who...is he incompetent and orange?

3

AliceLunar Apr 10, 2026 +3

You would be inclined to say the US, but you can hardly call them partners.

3

HotFartore Apr 10, 2026 +3

Ukraine has all the rights to attack any military Russian target and anything that feeds, supplies, touches the Russian army. Thousands of drones daily is the target and Czarist Putin will break down.

3

Rathalos-487 Apr 10, 2026 +3

And I say the “partners” can piss off.

3

darokrol Apr 10, 2026 +3

Was that partner mumbling about an autopen?

3

Sedulas Apr 10, 2026 +3

Agent Krasnov

3

kirillah Apr 10, 2026 +6

Well, how about these "partners" to ask Russians not to bomb Ukraine every goddamn day?

6

sigmund14 Apr 10, 2026 +2

I like the transparency, if you can call it that. Saying what was requested, but not by whom. Nobody accused. If anybody would get angry publicly, they would just reveal that it was them. Should be a more popular tactic.

2

demon_of_laplace Apr 10, 2026 +2

If the US self chosen war with Iran isn't solved soon, which is hard, people are going to starve to death. Trump and the Iranian leadership is going to rightfully be compared to Stalin, and probably surpass by an order of magnitude, in the amount of death they caused.

2

momoenthusiastic Apr 10, 2026 +2

Did they say thank you, btw?

2

Dreamgirl1654 Apr 10, 2026 +2

At the beginning of the war, Russians said they would take Kyiv in three days, but now they’re taking it in the mouth

2

[deleted] Apr 10, 2026 +2

Did they say "Fixin" or "Y'all" at all?

2

homebrew_1 Apr 10, 2026 +2

Art of the deal?

2

ScottOld Apr 10, 2026 +2

Just say it was Trump and be done with it

2

Shyface_Killah Apr 10, 2026 +2

"Un-indicted Co-conspirators", you mean?

2

readthatlastyear Apr 10, 2026 +2

Don't these "Partners" know Ukrainians are dying every day to a war of invasion?

2

Vanthan Apr 10, 2026 +3

I’d rather walk and take my bike than ask Ukraine to stop attacking Russian refineries. 🇺🇦

3

Rusty3414 Apr 11, 2026 +2

i.e. the US

2

RealisticEntity Apr 11, 2026 +2

Nope. Ukraine needs to do what it can to survive. Hitting Russia's main source of income supporting its military and its invasion efforts in Ukraine is a good thing.

2

Harbinger2001 Apr 11, 2026 +3

Time for new partners. The Arab oil states have plenty of money and Ukraine has lots of anti-drone technology.

3

T4whereareyou Apr 11, 2026 +2

Someone who is bothered by the Epstein files.

2

New-History7971 Apr 11, 2026 +2

Ukraine, don't stop! You're doing the right thing!

2

Patient-Ordinary-359 Apr 11, 2026 +2

Go faster, Ukraine. Burn that rotten place to the ground.

2

PanneKopp Apr 10, 2026 +3

Agent Krasnov leading officer unsatisfied ?

3

Ultra_Metal Apr 10, 2026 +2

It is becoming increasingly clear that most world leaders care more about oil prices than about the lives of Ukrainians who are being murdered by Russia or Iranians who are being murdered by their own government.

2

martmart75 Apr 10, 2026 +1

Hilarious!

1

islandsimian Apr 10, 2026 +1

It was John Barron

1

M8753 Apr 10, 2026 +1

Idiots, build your own refineries. This is a long term opportunity!

1

Combat_Orca Apr 10, 2026 +1

Better not have been Starmer

1

faithOver Apr 10, 2026 +1

It’s probably every Western country. EU, US, UK. Trumps and BB’s lockdown of the Strait is disastrous.

1

Doowoo Apr 10, 2026 +1

Old news ?

1

Intruder313 Apr 10, 2026 +1

One of the Axis of Evil then: USA

1

M4rth1988 Apr 10, 2026 +1

One more reason to strike them

1

MaybeTheDoctor Apr 10, 2026 +1

What will this unnamed partner do in return ?

1

idee2 Apr 10, 2026 +1

Do it. Attack them!

1

PassionInitial7487 Apr 10, 2026 +1

Sounds like it's working then.

1

Tobias---Funke Apr 10, 2026 +1

Tell partners to f*** off.

1

UsagiTsukino Apr 10, 2026 +1

Please don't let it be Germany!

1

Meowser02 Apr 10, 2026 +1

It was Hungary wasn’t it

1

Albahith1 Apr 10, 2026 +1

As we say in Austria, "Ja klar ne"

1

outofgulag Apr 10, 2026 +1

I bet there non-partners asking him to keep doing it ( the Gulf Countries ??)

1

SandVir Apr 10, 2026 +1

Is America actually paying for this service from Ukraine? That would be only fair.

1

SandVir Apr 10, 2026 +1

American wanted to put China to the test by taking their oil... how does that suit him?

1

DaySecure7642 Apr 10, 2026 +1

It must be Iceland I guess lol....

1

satanzhand Apr 10, 2026 +1

Consequences of Iran war: world at the brink of mass famine. So yeah a difficult request to reduce global issues... and oddly predictable for the world's greatest military

1

98VoteForPedro Apr 11, 2026 +1

What are the odds that they destroy enough oil refineries that force people to use more electric cars and greener energy

1

IndependentReal5788 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Funny ! Time to tell stops invading !

1

kataflokc Apr 11, 2026 +1

Nice of them to identify the most important targets 😂

1

grannyte Apr 11, 2026 +1

Blow them the f*** up they had 25 years to move away from oil they brought that onto them selves.

1

MeduseYahoo Apr 11, 2026 +1

Il est encore vivant lui ?

1

Skairex Apr 11, 2026 +1

Asked? So? How about no?

1

Dov1z Apr 11, 2026 +1

Sure, once they leave Ukraine

1

Puzzleheaded-Heat446 Apr 12, 2026 +1

When in doubt ....... Attack Attack Attack !

1

Zelensky says unnamed 'partners' asked Ukraine not to attack Russian oil refineries

💬 Send a Message

182 Comments