· 128 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 10, 2026 at 7:56 PM

Zohran Mamdani Interviewed by John Wilson in Video About Reducing New York City Scaffolding

Posted by sideAccount42


Zohran Mamdani Interviewed by John Wilson in Video About Reducing New York City Scaffolding (EXCLUSIVE)
Variety
Zohran Mamdani Interviewed by John Wilson in Video About Reducing New York City Scaffolding (EXCLUSIVE)
John Wilson interviews Zohran Mamdani in a new video about reducing scaffolding in New York City.

🚩 Report this post

128 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
8__D Apr 10, 2026 +931
I absolutely loved How To with John Wilson. I really wonder how his old landlord is doing
931
Green_Day_Fan Apr 10, 2026 +419
He has a new documentary about concrete coming out later this year - [https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_history_of_concrete](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_history_of_concrete)
419
palinsafterbirth Apr 10, 2026 +58
Thank you for this information
58
bigboyseason666 Apr 10, 2026 +15
I saw this at Sundance! It was great
15
InvoluntaryActions Apr 11, 2026 +7
why do they premiere a film and then wait 4 months until releasing it to the public? is it the final version?
7
DistortedAudio Apr 11, 2026 +42
To get a distributor. Often at these big film festivals fully produced films are aired and they get distribution deals which might get them into theaters (or a bunch of other stuff). It showed at Sundance in January and Magnolia Pictures acquired it for distribution in March. It happens with A24 stuff a fair amount. They’ll see something that they like at a festival and then release it in theaters.
42
InvoluntaryActions Apr 11, 2026 +6
wow! thanks i had no idea. man i really would like to go to a film festival. what's it like?
6
NamesTheGame Apr 11, 2026 +12
Film festivals are great, a lot of fun, cool people, memorable experiences. Everyone is there to actually see movies so you have (generally) a really engaged audience. You get to see movies without any hype or spoilery marketing, just going in blind. No online discourse to tell you how to feel, you just get to chat with other people there, or stick around for a Q&A to maybe learn about the movie. I used to go to TIFF every year and see as many movies as I could before I would get some kind of cold from overdoing it. Turns out running around the city watching 3+ movies every day from 8am-after midnight for a week straight is actually quite exhausting and challenging!
12
DistortedAudio Apr 11, 2026 +4
I’ve only been to a local one, but definitely support a local one near you if it exists! It usually lets you meet other people in your city/area that love films; and it allows you to meet directors/actors and so on directly. A lot of fun! You can also travel for a lot of bigger ones. A fair amount of them have tickets and stuff for the general public. Pricey but it lets you see a lot of stuff early and see some cool Q&As.
4
Hasbeast Apr 11, 2026 +2
It’s kinda crazy to me, working in the video game space, that they get the entire film shot and edited before then seeing if anyone will buy it for distribution. Do films get to the festival stage and then just never see the light of day because no distributor picks it up?
2
DistortedAudio Apr 11, 2026 +3
I think there are definitely films that reach the festival stage and essentially get a deal with a second or third rate distributor and they unceremoniously get dumped onto Amazon.
3
bigboyseason666 Apr 11, 2026 +1
Many Sundance films are made by fairly prestigious or at least well financed companies/teams, who for one reason or another didn’t want to sell the concept to a larger studio, and instead they made the movie they want to make then they make a profit on the sale. Best example I can think of is Palm Springs, which was made by The Lonely Island (who obviously have the wealth status and connections to make a good movie) then sold to Hulu for a ton of money. Sort of an everyone wins situation when it’s done right, because the big studio doesn’t get to ruin or diminish the vision of the makers
1
greaseapina Apr 12, 2026
that is why the films have financiers....
0
kkfvjk Apr 11, 2026 +1
Lucky! Those tickets went immediately.
1
RaisinZRH Apr 10, 2026 +14
Yes!
14
aBoredWizard Apr 10, 2026 +13
He talks about it in this interview on Doomscroll! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLhBO-_I34k
13
dont_shoot_jr Apr 10, 2026 +6
That seems like a pretty solid movie
6
Freethrowz69 Apr 11, 2026 +7
It’s definitely built on a really strong foundation
7
zoetrope_ Apr 11, 2026 +5
I really hope this is the project that will cement him as a great director.
5
real_nice_guy Apr 11, 2026 +1
we'll all need to support it by watching it.
1
nameduser365 Apr 10, 2026 +1
!remindme 4 months
1
MichaelTruly Apr 11, 2026 +1
This information has changed the whole course of my day.
1
dont_shoot_jr Apr 10, 2026 +43
Do I remember correctly that she has a much nicer house in Vegas now?
43
filthysize Apr 10, 2026 +36
Yeah he went to visit her in the second season.
36
hoopstick Apr 11, 2026 +6
THERE’S A SECOND SEASON?!
6
OmniManDidNothngWrng Apr 11, 2026 +17
there were 3
17
hoopstick Apr 11, 2026 +11
Well f*** me running
11
WampaCat Apr 10, 2026 +34
Sane it’s like the funniest show I never hear people talk about
34
squeazy Apr 10, 2026 +15
The foreskin restoration guy!
15
OmniManDidNothngWrng Apr 11, 2026 +10
Not nearly as upsetting as the cryogenics guy who was also very into self mutilation in the finale.
10
mrpopenfresh Apr 11, 2026 +2
What a character.
2
kiwi3p Apr 11, 2026 +4
In a similar-ish vibe, the new HBO show neighbors scratches this same itch. And I don’t hear anyone talking about it. It’s the last show that’s had me laughing as hard as I can, which I haven’t done since How To
4
theorys Apr 11, 2026 +3
That last episode…I had to pause it twice to do a lap around my apartment it got awkward.
3
kiwi3p Apr 11, 2026 +2
It’s so uncomfortable man. I was showing the show to my brother in law as this episode premiered. Was very uncomfortable. Still halfway through I had to say out loud “this is a masterpiece”
2
WampaCat Apr 11, 2026 +1
Ugh I only watched one episode of that. Maybe I wasn’t in the right mood for it, I just found it frustrating to watch all those people and then the episode just ends and nothing actually happens
1
hodgepodgelodger Apr 10, 2026 +4
Watch his recent interview on Doomscroll with Joshua Citerella.
4
SpaceForceAwakens Apr 11, 2026 +4
I miss his show. It was perfect.
4
North_Particular_758 Apr 11, 2026 +2
My girlfriend and I binged it the moment we discovered it. If I had the money, I’d keep the show going myself. Seriously love this series.
2
CactusTrack Apr 11, 2026 +2
Is the scaffolding episode the one with the guy trying to lengthen his member?
2
MrX16 Apr 11, 2026 +1
He wasn't trying to do that, he was trying to regenerate his foreskin
1
xxYINKxx Apr 10, 2026 +598
I know theres always bigger fish to fry when it comes to politics but it is refreshing to see some attention put into the little things.
598
sabrenation81 Apr 10, 2026 +333
It's politically smart as well. Small, easy, low-hanging fruit like this and the potholes are the perfect way to build a wellspring of popular public support. They're not life-changing but they're visible and tangible. It builds political capital which can then be spent toward achieving larger goals. Love him or hate him, Mamdani is a master politician. He knows how to play the game and I'd bet the farm on him being either a Governor or a Senator at some point in the future. (and just to be clear, I don't mean "play the game" in a negative context. You have to be able to do that to be effective in politics.)
333
kawawee Apr 11, 2026 +42
Those smaller things are not immediate life changing stuff. But they're indicators of larger long term issues that can be crippling. For example, politicians usually prefer to allocate budget to new, shiny, huge projects. They prefer to build new expressways or fancy development projects than maintaining the existing ones. Guess who can afford to live in those nice areas? Meanwhile proper, maintenance for existing (even critical) infrastructure can be inexpensive on paper but often gets swept under the rugs because no "constituents" are excited about potholes. The whole political systems since the Roman Republic have been modeled around men of boundless greed and ambitions, so "puny" undertakings like this are often deemed unattractive. And it's not just political. I work in software and I lost count of the many ambitious projects or initiatives that the middle managers or the C-levels prefer over maintenance (which they treat as a cost rather than value generating activity). So if potholes are filled then at least to people like me, it's real valuable work done, not just to score points.
42
[deleted] Apr 11, 2026 +206
[deleted]
206
oath2order Apr 11, 2026 +111
And it turns out you can be a successful leftist without being a Twitter firebrand. He knows how to make a coalition without compromising his values.
111
[deleted] Apr 11, 2026 +46
[deleted]
46
jakk88 Apr 11, 2026 +8
It's wild to me that we're at "do things for people" feeling like a key, but little known strategy for politics.
8
narnianini Apr 11, 2026 +50
It’s not that low hanging imo…in some places in the city the only time you’re not walking in a sidewalk shed is when you’re crossing the street, it’s ridiculous. It’s throwing a big cost (potentially millions in repairs, and annual 5/6 figure assessments) at the asset owners who have been skirting comprehensive facade maintenance by slapping these bandaids up. Totally agree that it builds political capital, just pointing out that it’s also a pretty big deal for the city because they are so pervasive.
50
SpikyCactusJuice Apr 11, 2026 +15
> “They’re not life-changing” Speak for yourself lol. Fixing the potholes around here would be such a coup and I would vote immediately for whoever fixed it.
15
sabrenation81 Apr 11, 2026 +4
Oh believe me, you're preaching to the choir. I live in Buffalo, NY. The salt and snow plows tear our streets up every winter and our streets are always full of potholes. I just mean "not life-changing" to the degree that some of his other plans like free childcare and free public transit are.
4
Aggressive_Chuck Apr 11, 2026 +2
Come to the UK, fixing our roads would feel like time travelling 100 years into the future 
2
avelineaurora Apr 11, 2026 +6
> They're not life-changing but they're visible and tangible. For real. I don't think I've *ever* driven on a road and not noticed when it's been recently fixed lol.
6
JudgmentalOwl Apr 11, 2026 +5
Small, quick wins are a great way to gain visibility, trust, and show you can make an impact. It's a great strategy to get noticed at work as well.
5
randohipponamo Apr 10, 2026 +18
It’s what mayors are for
18
hoxxxxx Apr 10, 2026 +13
it's the little things that matter if a politician centered their entire campaign around regulating these bright ass ridiculous headlights cars have now, they would have my full support. just as an example.
13
raysofdavies Apr 10, 2026 +148
Scaffolding isn’t a little thing in New York.
148
xxYINKxx Apr 10, 2026 +115
i understand that, thats not what i meant.
115
xX_7HR0W-4W4Y_Xx Apr 10, 2026 +93
Listnookors try not to be pedantic challenge level impossible
93
Lukeds Apr 11, 2026 +18
I mean, the point of their comment was it IS a small scope thing. It's one city, inside one of 50 states, of just one country of many on earth. It is a little thing, it is a small scope thing and it is refreshing that Mamdani cares. It is, however, a small thing. 
18
africanlivedit Apr 10, 2026 +19
lol that’s the point of the comment above
19
anormalgeek Apr 11, 2026 +8
Oh ffs, you know what they meant.
8
StatementOk470 Apr 10, 2026 +6
It’s, like, really tall.
6
onarainyafternoon Apr 10, 2026 +3
Brah
3
wjpreis Apr 11, 2026 +1
I’m very confused by the responses to the responses to this comment. It’s not a little thing in New York and this your response wasn’t pedantic 
1
IGotSoulBut Apr 10, 2026 -1
It’s an everywhere thing. 
-1
WikipediaBurntSienna Apr 11, 2026 +5
I heard scaffolding is a loophole used to avoid having to keep your building up to code.
5
scurvy1984 Apr 11, 2026 +3
lol you’re getting roasted by people who don’t know. I’m a west coaster but went to NYC for a wedding a while ago and I noticed how much scaffolding there was
3
sherbert-stock Apr 11, 2026 +2
Nobody who knows would describe it as a little issue.
2
FeloniousDrunk101 Apr 11, 2026 +3
It’s refreshing to see what electing a person who has actually walked around New York can do to the priorities of the Mayor’s office. I love visiting the city, but if I was living in it, these little things would add up and absolutely impact my daily quality of life. It’s nice to see a human being in office who knows thar and is at least attempting to try to do something about it.
3
Ivan_Jerkoffski Apr 10, 2026 +87
Didn’t Gamble and Holtz use a scaffolding permit violation to bring down David Ershon?
87
mrraybaby Apr 11, 2026 +37
I hear they also saved the entire NYPD pension from being wiped out. They are no scrubs.
37
sm3rsh Apr 11, 2026 +6
There's no way you're not referencing TLC on purpose!!
6
TheSupaCoopa Apr 11, 2026 +2
I’m a peacock! You’ve gotta let me fly!
2
Livueta_Zakalwe Apr 10, 2026 +20
Nobody cares about Klay Thompson’s thoughts on scaffolding? https://youtu.be/t40e3kaHmrs
20
Gamebird8 Apr 10, 2026 +161
With the advent of drones, aside from meticulous hand inspections, there's really no reason to have a scaffold for building inspections
161
Kazen_Orilg Apr 10, 2026 +311
the real reason is to protect them from liability of falling debris from the aging facades hitting pedestrians. Its not that the scaffolds are actually for inspections, they just don't want to pay for repairs in the first place. Not that this is good or should be allowed, its just the current dynamic.
311
DoubleAd8791 Apr 10, 2026 +46
I would highly recommend everyone watch the scaffolding episode of John Wilson’s show (season 1 episode 2 of “How To with John Wilson”).
46
roostercrowe Apr 12, 2026 +2
or just the whole series. it’s really good
2
CJ_Guns Apr 11, 2026 +16
Of note, drone launches are illegal in NYC, without crazy authority, as far as I know. As in, you can’t just LAANC it up.
16
Desperate_Tea_6297 Apr 10, 2026 +67
This sounds like the most New York crossover ever: “infrastructure policy, but make it awkward.” Honestly they should just rebrand scaffolding as permanent shade and tourist viewing platforms.
67
dont_shoot_jr Apr 10, 2026 +29
“It’s art!” — wife of scaffolding guy at a scaffolding convention 
29
seeasea Apr 10, 2026 +3
Sidewalk sheds*
3
MattBrey Apr 11, 2026 +20
Can anyone please give some more context for somebody who's never been to new York? Why is scaffolding an issue? What alternative is there when you're constructing a building? I gather from the comments that they're taking too long to build and they leave them there for years?
20
SoftDom-t206 Apr 11, 2026 +58
They go on buildings that have already been built, and stay there forever. The scaffolding is required if an existing building hasn't been recently inspected to ensure any decorative elements won't fall off and hit pedestrians below. The inpection has to be done every few years as buidings age. It's cheaper to just put up the scaffolding once and never get inspected ever.
58
MattBrey Apr 11, 2026 +25
Oh that's so dumb then. Makes sense why this is a problem
25
Photo_Synthetic Apr 11, 2026 +15
Yup there are literally hundreds of miles of scaffolding in NYC. It's everywhere you go. It always appears temporary but it rarely is. Some places have permanent scaffolding that is actually pleasant to look at but most of it is super basic.
15
kawag Apr 11, 2026 +12
A lot is explained in the article. > In voiceover, Mamdani explains that while scaffolding is meant to serve as temporary protection for pedestrians navigating construction throughout the city, some scaffolding has been up for more than 15 years, becoming a claustrophobic eyesore and impacting walkability. > Mamdani outlines a new set of policies meant to reduce scaffolding. Because intensive building inspections require the installation of scaffolding, New York City will be increasing the amount of time allowed in between building inspections from five years to six. Buildings that are 40 years old or newer will instead be allowed to rely on visual inspections every three years and wait 12 years before intensive inspections. Additionally, fines will be levied for units of scaffolding that stay up for two years “past their welcome,” and the city is imposing a 40-foot maximum on how far scaffolding can extend into the sidewalk and street. We can have similar issues in other places; it’s quite a relatable problem. In Germany you often see [pipes used to drain construction sites](https://www.morethangreen.es/en/berlins-pink-pipes/) and I swear in some places they have been up for like 10 years at least. Maybe some of them are meant to be permanent, I’m not sure, but they look like they are supposed to be temporary, being supported by plain concrete blocks and such.
12
MattBrey Apr 11, 2026
Hmm those are some pretty aggressive inspection policies. Idk how an inspection can take more than a couple weeks, even if it's an old building. Also those pipes I've never seen them ever before and they look crazy
0
LouisIV Apr 11, 2026 +2
John Wilson covered Scaffolding in depth on his streaming documentary series “How To” which is why Mamdani worked with him on this. It’s extremely detailed and hilarious
2
FullMotionVideo Apr 11, 2026 +50
I'm afraid of the downvotes I'll get by asking, because I have no negative opinions about Zohran, but why is this in TV instead of an NYC sub? I've never been to New York in my life, and the headline has me struggling to understand why I should care.
50
littlejackfilms Apr 11, 2026 +71
HBO Show "How To With John Wilson" had an [entire episode about scaffolding in NYC](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ_o_9MaJ24). Amazing show.
71
justhereforhides Apr 11, 2026 +17
John Wilson is a decently popular documentary tv maker
17
Aggressive_Chuck Apr 11, 2026 +2
Same reason half the front page is chat show hosts going on about trump
2
Ylsid Apr 11, 2026
Because the video subs are overrun with politics To all you downvoters go look at /r/videos and tell me how many of the front page aren't Trump related
0
PM_ME_TRICEPS Apr 11, 2026 +1
Bingo
1
PM_ME_TRICEPS Apr 11, 2026 -2
The political astroturfing of neutral sublistnooks is the answer to your question. It’s done mostly by bot farms and fanatics to gain momentum for their political view. For Listnook that means mostly pro liberal, anti conservative propaganda pounds unrelated sublistnooks until they are fully converted to supporting their cause.
-2
HonestNeighborhood67 Apr 10, 2026 +4
I was listening to a podcast today and one of the hosts made an interesting point about government. People would prefer government to behind the scenes and not really noticeable. They were speaking about all of the madness going on in the DJT Circus, and said as soon as changes started happening that affected people’s everyday lives, it was a problem (food prices and ICE specifically.) I’d actually go a step further to say that if government does POSITIVE things on a seemingly small scale that affects people’s everyday lives, they will appreciate those actions much more. He’s already made a big push to fill potholes, and if he’s able to do something about all the scaffolding, it will be a HUGE win for the people of the city.
4
drasticallycrass Apr 11, 2026 +3
I literally almost commented earlier on a scaffolding post that it sounded like they needed John Wilson’s input.
3
ro536ud Apr 11, 2026 +7
I love when he just turns off the baby shredding device and makes it look so easy
7
molokoplusone Apr 11, 2026 +3
Love this collaboration. John Wilson is brilliant and such a talented filmmaker.
3
gjon89 Apr 10, 2026 +2
I hope they somehow end up in the underground subways and coming across the mole people.
2
Wind_Responsible Apr 11, 2026 +2
He sounded like he did not know anything about construction and was going to make people a little bit unsafe by extending out building inspection times and limiting the length of time needed for construction because it uses scaffolding. The truth seems to be more that any construction that could potentially have something fall needs scaffolding. Anything. Brick. Paint drop. Feather. That’s what the problem sounds like to me. Either too much regulation regarding the scaffoldings or it’s being misinterpreted.
2
graygreen Apr 11, 2026 +2
I wonder how many times he'll do the Zohran fake smile? Probably a lot
2
pumpkinspruce Apr 10, 2026 +1
I wish he was my mayor and I wish he could run for president.
1
Iusedthistocomment Apr 11, 2026 +1
Now you're in New Yooork, Scaffold City where half the City is cover'd up, and there's nothing you can dooooooo.
1
Y0___0Y Apr 10, 2026 -18
I like this Zoro Salami guy
-18
RyFromTheChi Apr 11, 2026 -1
Love John Wilson so much.
-1
ToonMasterRace Apr 10, 2026 -61
Bunch of softball questions which doesn’t go into his violent racist rhetoric
-61
TheGreatGenghisJon Apr 10, 2026 +22
What violent, racist rhetoric? He say something like "whites are poisoning the blood of our country" or something?
22
aj743aj Apr 10, 2026 +10
He called Mexican immigrants "criminals" and "rapists". Which is obviously a horrible thing to say. Can't believe that he got elected. I mean, who would vote for someone like that?
10
ToonMasterRace Apr 10, 2026 -30
Globalize the intifada is pretty bad. Imagine if someone said “globalize the crusades” while bashing Muslims.
-30
TheGreatGenghisJon Apr 10, 2026 +18
He didn't say that. He just didn't condemn it, said he saw it as a phrase meant that Palestine should be liberated, and then said it's language that he wouldn't encourage. Did you not actually hear anything about that controversy aside from what Cuomo kept saying instead of answering policy questions? What else we got, something like "finish the job" in response to bombing women and children?
18
ToonMasterRace Apr 10, 2026 -28
You can justify the slogan all you want. What would you say if it was “globalize the crusades” with regards to Muslims?
-28
TheGreatGenghisJon Apr 10, 2026 +12
Depends. What's the context I've heard it in? Has the person said anything else overtly problematic? Has the person actually committed violent acts that show he supports it? Has the person done a 180 on that phrase since? You hate him because he's brown, not because of what *he didn't even say*. But hey, you wanna get on a moral high ground, how do you feel about "grab her right in the p****", "Finish the job", "knock him out, get him the hell out of here", or "an entire civilization will die tomorrow"?
12
ToonMasterRace Apr 10, 2026 -3
So, deflections about unrelated things to other people aside, you think “globalize the crusades” is an acceptable thing to say while speaking against Muslims
-3
TheGreatGenghisJon Apr 10, 2026 +14
I answered your question, you just don't like the answer. What's the context? Some dude running down the street and screaming it? Some guy saying "I get why they're saying it" while referencing protestors because Christians are being slaughtered in a walled off area? Because if it's the latter, then I also understand the feeling behind the sentiment. Now, if you're going to be Mr. high Horse, does your moral outrage extend to the president actually encouraging violence?
14
ZeppelinJ0 Apr 11, 2026 +3
You know the answer to your last question, maga is desperate to draw equivalence between the objectively evil shit the president does and whatever perceived minor thing the "other side" may or may not have done so they don't have to admit their entire worldview for the past 10 years was completely fabricated by a child rapist trying to avoid jail time
3
jez124 Apr 10, 2026
Dont worry theres plenty of islamophobes in america in poltical office.
0
Ok_Muscle_3770 Apr 10, 2026 +7
“Death to Arabs” from Zionists were pretty bad, but let’s ignore that, hypocrite.
7
ToonMasterRace Apr 10, 2026 +1
I don’t see “zionists” rioting in front of mosques with the mayors approval
1
TheGreatGenghisJon Apr 10, 2026 +9
Do you see them on quads running over praying Palestinians in the West Bank? I saw that video.
9
LiveChocolate8819 Apr 10, 2026 +1
Nah but they rioted in front of a prison to support the IDF being allowed to r*** prisoners
1
tacitry Apr 10, 2026 +1
As a Jew, f*** zionists and the extremism that has been used to justify the most abhorrent acts of violence against others. Never again means never again, not never again except when we do it
1
BroughtBagLunchSmart Apr 11, 2026 -1
Yea that is because they are bombing refugee camps with free bombs from America.
-1
Ok_Muscle_3770 Apr 11, 2026 -3
Al Aqsa mosque has been literally seized by IDF forces and settlers. Keep playing victim, ziobot
-3
Gobblewicket Apr 11, 2026 +4
The Secretary of Defense, who really wants to be the secretary of "war", has both Iron f****** Cross tattoos and crusade tattoos. The same man who is just illegally bombing the f*** out of any and all brown folks. So how bout you worry about that, instead of a socialist trying to get affordable food, fix potholes and scaffolding issues in NYC. Jesus H tap dancing Christ are you people exhausting.
4
BroughtBagLunchSmart Apr 11, 2026 +1
> Imagine if someone said “globalize the crusades” while bashing Muslims. Pete Hegseth got a tattoo that says that and our fat nazi pedophile president put him in charge of the military.
1
Photo_Synthetic Apr 11, 2026 -1
So he should be policing speech? He didn't say those words he just didn't condemn them. Because he actually believes in freedom of speech. Also the intent of the phrase is basically Plaestine wanting the support of the world to stop the genocide of their people which is a pretty fair request. Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank is something no one should support. I'm guessing you support the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people? Intafada just means uprising or rebellion which most people would do against an oppressive regime who keeps killing, displacing and imprisoning millions of their people.
-1
← Back to Board